Strategy added by Sneaks
1
1
|
Average rating: |
5 |
|
Ratings: |
1 |
|
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters.
|
 |
|||||||
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Level 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0  |
N/A | 28  |
85
1:25
|
12+ | ||
|
Any Level 1+ Pet
Any Pet
|
Saintgabrial
|
Level 1+ Script |
2 | 4.9 |
N/A | 54 |
79
1:19
|
12 | |
|
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Any pet with Nocturnal Strike will work, flying or otherwise, as long as it has sufficient power.
|
Level 1+ Script |
2 | 4.8 |
N/A | 8 |
71
1:11
|
8-9 | |
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
For the second pet, you can use any that has Explode, or any other self-destruct skill. I'm just very fond of the Dragonling.
|
Level 1+ |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 1 |
104
1:44
|
13 | |
Any Pet
|
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 0 |
52
0:52
|
7+ | |||
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Level 1+ Script |
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 1 |
95
1:35
|
13+ | ||
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
This is a work in progress. I'm not sure what happens if it is call of darkness or noctornal strike crits but there is a chance you get neither and obviously I can't test them all on 1 time fights.
If Tiny snowman dies, just bring in #1 pet, kill with Arcane Storm, then swap to level pet. |
Level 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 2 |
70
1:10
|
8-10 | |
|
Any Level 10+ Pet
|
|
Level 10+ |
2 | 4.0 |
N/A | 6 |
49
0:49
|
8+ | |
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
The rounds will vary depending on how many turns the Moon-Touched Netherwhelp has against Bones. Sounds weird, but pray for Call Darkness. Makes it go by much quicker, heh.
Video for Fight |
Level 1+ Script Unobtainable |
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 0 |
78
1:18
|
9+ | |
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Level 1+ |
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 0 |
75
1:15
|
10-11 |
Incl. steps:
Any Level 1+ Pet
For the second pet, you can use any that has Explode, or any other self-destruct skill. I'm just very fond of the Dragonling.
| Before | After | Experience Gain | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ➜ | 13 | 5981 |
| 2 | ➜ | 13 | 6353 |
| 3 | ➜ | 14 | 6683 |
| 4 | ➜ | 14 | 6971 |
| 5 | ➜ | 14 | 7219 |
| 6 | ➜ | 15 | 7425 |
| 7 | ➜ | 15 | 7590 |
| 8 | ➜ | 16 | 7714 |
| 9 | ➜ | 16 | 7796 |
| 10 | ➜ | 17 | 7838 |
| 11 | ➜ | 17 | 7838 |
| 12 | ➜ | 18 | 7796 |
| 13 | ➜ | 19 | 7714 |
| 14 | ➜ | 19 | 7590 |
| 15 | ➜ | 20 | 7425 |
| 16 | ➜ | 20 | 7219 |
| 17 | ➜ | 21 | 6971 |
| 18 | ➜ | 22 | 6683 |
| 19 | ➜ | 22 | 6353 |
| 20 | ➜ | 23 | 5981 |
| 21 | ➜ | 23 | 5569 |
| 22 | ➜ | 24 | 5115 |
| 23 | ➜ | 25 | 3900 |
| 24 | ➜ | 25 | 1980 |
|
Safari Hat |
|
|
Lesser Pet Treat |
|
|
Pet Treat |
|
|
Darkmoon Hat |
|
|
Pet Battle Week |
|
= |
Pet levels to 25 with minimal XP lost |
|
|
= |
Additional XP above level 25 is lost |
|
1 Min 44 Sec
13 
2022-07-11 10:05:20
2020-08-10 01:41:47
10,799
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
1
Eekwibble
wrote on 2024-11-16 19:09:35
You should only use Wild Magic on Turn 1.
This difference is massive in terms of success rate. Well, "massive" is relative to how many losses occur. At this level, it's fine margins.
Script for this strategy:
use(Wild Magic:592) [ enemy.round=1 ]
use(Arcane Explosion:299)
use(Explode:282) [ enemy.aura(Undead:242).exists ]
use(Thunderbolt:779) [ enemy(#3).active ]
use(Breath:115)
change(#3)
This original strategy has a 99.2% success rate. 79 losses out of 10,000 battles with the sim tool. However;
Wild Magic only on Turn 1 script:
use(Wild Magic:592) [ round=1 ]
use(Arcane Explosion:299)
use(Explode:282) [ enemy.aura(Undead:242).exists ]
use(Thunderbolt:779) [ enemy(#3).active ]
use(Breath:115)
change(#3)
This has a 99.8% success rate. 21 losses out of 10,000 sims.
Cutting ~75% of losses is a huge improvement to me.
As pointed out by Grainne below, this is all with the sim tool which has not yet been properly set up for this battle. That may change everything, or it may change nothing. Maybe it hasn't been set up because it doesn't need to be as everything is random, including enemy ability choice.
Big kudos for the strategy.
I would personally change the pet order so the surviving level pet is in slot #3, because the only reason people normally put the level pet in slot#2 is to rotate through it to get to their clean-up pet in slot #3, but that is me being finicky.
If you want to do that, change the last line of the script to;
change(#2)
. (edited)
1
Gráinne
wrote on 2024-11-17 07:18:53
https://www.wow-petguide.com/Strategy/21017/Enbisee,_Mal,_and_Bones
had a success rate on the Sim of 99.8% when I put it through 1000 runs.
Incidentally, I want to underline "on the Sim" because 1. the author of the Sim hasn't tested/released the Sim for this battle yet, as you can see because strats don't get a Sim rating automatically and 2. even then, the Sim may need to be corrected for something. When you see a Sim result you don't expect, you should examine the Sim's log, and compare it against some real logs.
Now, in the case of this specific battle, the Sim itself displays a warning when you run it
"This tamer doesn't have a scripted behavior. All pets will cast abilities in random order"
so condition 1 definitely applies, and the Sim's results can't be considered reliable.
Of course, if you tested every strat 100 times and have actual live results for all of them, I will be suitably impressed. :D
1
Eekwibble
wrote on 2024-11-17 13:27:35
Also, for some reason, I missed the snowman strat when I was testing them all. Not sure how.
New Comment: