Strategy added by Anesthetize
31
Average rating: |
4.6 |
Ratings: |
56 |
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Tags
Filter strategies:
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||
1 | 2 | 4.6 ![]() |
31 ![]() |
111
![]()
1:51
|
16+ | ![]() |
||||
2 |
![]()
Bassalt's randomness makes this super fun /s
Two not-so-great avenues of RNG, so I apologize ahead of time. The good news is, the strat is relatively short, so if you need to quit (which I've scripted in), it won't be long into the fight that it'll happen. : / ETA: The P/P is the recommended breed for this fight. Others have reported success with the P/B breed, but it has extra degrees of RNG since it takes three Grasps to kill Clawz instead of two. |
RNG Script |
2 | 4.1 ![]() |
34 ![]() |
107
![]()
1:47
|
15 | ![]() |
||
3 |
![]()
Tried to make a strategy that minimized randomness and didn't have pets that were difficult to obtain. The first slot can be replaced with Carpal if you have that, as long as you have Roar of the Dead, Return to Rest, and a basic damage ability. The Fragment of Desire can be any of the 3 Fragment pets that drop from the Reliquary boss in Black Temple since they all learn the 2 necessary abilities and have less health than Grip of Terror.
The only real hiccups in this fight are based on the randomness of the first 2 pets' abilities, specifically Mudslide and Whirlpool. During testing, these moves were sometimes used at the worst times, and sometimes never used at all the entire fight. However, other than a few key points involving Roar of the Dead usage, the strategy is a lot of spamming your attacking moves no matter which attacks your opponents do and coming out on top anyways. |
RNG |
2 | 4.6 ![]() |
7 ![]() |
118
![]()
1:58
|
15+ | ![]() |
||
4 |
![]()
I won the first fight with this team, while the other two were impossible. I finished the fight in the undead phase.
Here is the log (french log): https://pastebin.com/Sb3J5Tj8 |
RNG |
2 | 3.7 ![]() |
3 ![]() |
145
![]()
2:25
|
19 | ![]() |
||
5 |
![]()
This is based on the original 10.1 PTR tamer pets' stats/quality/etc. It might need adjustments on last-minute changes (potential nerfs).
You can replace Severs with Sharpclaw, or try other breeds of the first two pets, but from my experience, it will only add more RNG to the fight (i.E. P/P Severs might not have the Speed advantage for 1 turn, but only needs 3 turns to kill Clawz) |
Breed Script |
2 | 4.8 ![]() |
3 ![]() |
140
![]()
2:20
|
17+ | ![]() |
||
6 |
![]()
Tried 15 times, 12 win, 3 lost
|
RNG |
2 | 4.0 ![]() |
0 ![]() |
150
![]()
2:30
|
14+ | ![]() |
||
7 | RNG |
2 | 2.7 ![]() |
1 ![]() |
139
![]()
2:19
|
18 | ![]() |
Incl. steps:
Substitutes:
1 / 4
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Careful. Every pet here is poisonous or venomous, or both.
1
Medusa#1484
wrote on 2023-08-10 03:57:04
1
Aur
wrote on 2023-08-10 02:20:29
3
(OP) Anesthetize
wrote on 2023-05-18 13:05:16
2
Puny
wrote on 2023-08-09 11:49:13
1
kobby
wrote on 2023-08-05 16:49:09
11
dreamgarden
wrote on 2023-06-12 05:25:30
use(Enrage:1392) [!self.aura(Enraged:1391).exists && self.ability(Soulrush:752).usable]
use(Reflective Shield:1105) [enemy(Murrey:3558).active]
use(Spiritfire Bolt:1066) [enemy.hp < 216]
use(Soulrush:752)
use(Spiritfire Bolt:1066)
use(Toxic Smoke:640) [!enemy.aura(Toxic Smoke:639).exists]
use(Slime:1763)
change(next) (edited)
1
Shengis
wrote on 2023-06-14 11:51:38
0
Ded#1245
wrote on 2023-06-07 21:40:53
use(Soulrush:752)
use(Spiritfire Bolt:1066)
use(Slime:1763) [enemy.aura(Toxic Smoke:639).exists]
use(Toxic Smoke:640)
change(next)
3
BorisMorosov
wrote on 2023-05-19 08:21:52
1
(OP) Anesthetize
wrote on 2023-06-03 10:53:54
1
JimmySmits
wrote on 2023-06-02 22:59:50
1
Котэшечко
wrote on 2023-06-03 17:26:31
New Comment: