Strategy added by Brawler
57
57
|
Average rating: |
4.7 |
|
Ratings: |
54 |
|
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters.
|
 |
|||||||
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Level 1+ Script |
2 | 4.7  |
N/A | 106  |
81
1:21
|
11 | ||
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Brawler
|
DragonsAfterDark: I've updated the strategy and tdScript to hopefully help stabilize it. Let me know if the updated version worked better for you ^^
|
RNG Shop Level 1+ Script Unobtainable |
2 | 4.7 |
N/A | 57 |
105
1:45
|
15 |
|
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
UPDATE: This strategy by Rikade on Wowhead still works as of the Shadowlands pre-patch. As stated in the comments below if you have a P/S, P/P, P/B Starlette AND you get critted by Otto, you will die and have to start over. It doesn't happen very often from my experience with a P/B Starlette.
DragonsAfterDark: 4 August 24, changes to strategy instructions and script have been made in OP's absence due to DoT changes for Toxic Smoke. |
Level 1+ Script |
2 | 4.6 |
N/A | 134 |
130
2:10
|
15+ | |
Any Pet
|
Script thanks to Lazey
|
RNG Script |
2 | 4.6 |
N/A | 73 |
145
2:25
|
17 | |
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
This strategy is based on Remte's strategy.
12 rounds. |
Level 1+ Script |
2 | 4.6 |
N/A | 26 |
91
1:31
|
12 | |
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
No Whirlpool crit protection yet. :(
When my Bombling crit before the shield was cast, it oneshot Mr. Pointy. Another 5x Zap and Explode saved the fight. For a crit in the following round, skip a Zap and proceed with the mines. With the current stat requirements, pet #1 can withstand a single crit of Water Jet. The minimum is 1417 HP. |
Level 1+ Script |
2 | 4.5 |
N/A | 12 |
88
1:28
|
13 | |
|
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
It may be necessary to restart if Lil' Bling dies early.
Originally from Henry#1930 in the comments. |
Level 1+ |
2 | 4.4 |
N/A | 23 |
115
1:55
|
14 | |
|
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Not fully tested yet.
Any suggestions welcome :) |
Level 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 7 |
93
1:33
|
12-13 | |
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Full credit goes to roeevv on wowhead.com for this strategy. Didn't see it here, so added it ;)
|
Breed Level 1+ Script |
2 | 4.0 |
N/A | 26 |
105
1:45
|
16 | |
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
With 10.2 Changes I have modified (9/12/23):
* P/S is now the only one which is 10 rounds (Other breads would be 11). * H/P is all but fail proof but standard 11 rounds (others approx 1-2%). * H/H potentially adds an extra round (makes it 12) and is not fail proof. * There is a chance level pet will get no xp due to final wind-up crit (~5%). I've changed to Obsidian Warwhelp from Timeless Mechanical Dragonling (which can be used as alternative and still does work but adds at least 5% chance to fail due to getting a crit kill on SYD early) Have only practically tested with P/P, H/P and P/S Iron Starlette (with both Obsidian and TMD) if you try others, please let me know the results. |
Level 1+ Script |
2 | 3.9 |
N/A | 15 |
80
1:20
|
10 | |
|
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Level 1+ |
2 | 3.9 |
N/A | 13 |
118
1:58
|
15-16 | ||
|
Not trying to level, just trying to complete the daily quest with as much consistency and as fast as possible each day. This script has a consistent 8 round KO, and a very rare 6 round KO. :)
|
Breed Script |
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 1 |
65
1:05
|
8 | |
|
|
RNG Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 6 |
145
2:25
|
20 | |
|
Eruionmel
|
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 1 |
137
2:17
|
17 | ||
|
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 3 |
123
2:03
|
18 | |||
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
For those of you who haven't got Lil Bling: Works every time, safe strategy. But Twilight-Clutch Sister MUST be P/S breed.
|
Breed Level 1+ |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 3 |
105
1:45
|
16 | |
|
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 2 |
125
2:05
|
17 | |||
|
This strategy has worked for me every time so far, not sure if it's breed specific.
I have no idea how to write the TD Rematch script, sorry! |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 1 |
125
2:05
|
17-18 | ||
Any Level 25+ Mech
|
Breed |
2 | 4.2 |
N/A | 3 |
90
1:30
|
12 | ||
|
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Level 1+ |
2 | 3.0 |
N/A | 7 |
120
2:00
|
16 | ||
|
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Powerball is used to get the speed advantage over Mr. Pointy and Otto.
Thus, this strategy should work with any Starlette-breed (mine is P/H), since Trunks softens up Mr. Pointy with AoE. The only Starlette-breed that could have a problem might be H/H. |
Level 1+ |
2 | 4.0 |
N/A | 1 |
152
2:32
|
23 | |
Any Level 5+ Pet
|
This strategy was originally created by @LilTurd1272 and later refined by @Alma.
If your bunny dies before Syd dies, you will need to restart the fight! |
Level 5+ Script |
2 | 3.7 |
N/A | 2 |
108
1:48
|
16 | |
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
I really like Baa'lial, but infortunately he's not in many strategies ; so here is a nice way of using it. Enjoy ! :)
|
RNG Level 1+ Script Unobtainable |
2 | 3.0 |
N/A | 1 |
110
1:50
|
15-16 | |
|
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
RNG Level 1+ |
2 | 3.4 |
N/A | 1 |
120
2:00
|
13 | ||
|
|
Script |
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 0 |
62
1:02
|
7 | ||
|
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Evil
|
Level 1+ |
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 0 |
180
3:00
|
29 | |
|
Not a perfect group (as there is no leveling pet space), but a group that works well on both teams.
|
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 0 |
120
2:00
|
15 | ||
|
Breed |
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 0 |
125
2:05
|
16+ | ||
|
Shop Script Unobtainable |
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 0 |
125
2:05
|
17 | ||
|
RNG Script |
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 0 |
115
1:55
|
14+ | ||
|
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Cooked this up cause I don't have Enchanted Broom yet. It's slow but it's very consistent. A few unlucky crits should still be manageable. It's hilarious how Hyjal Wisp can basically solo the entire fight, we only let it die to facilitate the level pet.
You can probably replace Darkmoon Zeppelin with another Explode pet, but it'll most likely cost additional turns; Missile brings Otto's HP down to just enough for Explode threshold. |
RNG Level 1+ |
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 0 |
159
2:39
|
29 |
Incl. steps:
Any Level 1+ Pet
Substitutes:
1 / 2
DragonsAfterDark: I've updated the strategy and tdScript to hopefully help stabilize it. Let me know if the updated version worked better for you ^^
| Before | After | Experience Gain | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ➜ | 13 | 5981 |
| 2 | ➜ | 13 | 6353 |
| 3 | ➜ | 14 | 6683 |
| 4 | ➜ | 14 | 6971 |
| 5 | ➜ | 14 | 7219 |
| 6 | ➜ | 15 | 7425 |
| 7 | ➜ | 15 | 7590 |
| 8 | ➜ | 16 | 7714 |
| 9 | ➜ | 16 | 7796 |
| 10 | ➜ | 17 | 7838 |
| 11 | ➜ | 17 | 7838 |
| 12 | ➜ | 18 | 7796 |
| 13 | ➜ | 19 | 7714 |
| 14 | ➜ | 19 | 7590 |
| 15 | ➜ | 20 | 7425 |
| 16 | ➜ | 20 | 7219 |
| 17 | ➜ | 21 | 6971 |
| 18 | ➜ | 22 | 6683 |
| 19 | ➜ | 22 | 6353 |
| 20 | ➜ | 23 | 5981 |
| 21 | ➜ | 23 | 5569 |
| 22 | ➜ | 24 | 5115 |
| 23 | ➜ | 25 | 3900 |
| 24 | ➜ | 25 | 1980 |
|
Safari Hat |
|
|
Lesser Pet Treat |
|
|
Pet Treat |
|
|
Darkmoon Hat |
|
|
Pet Battle Week |
|
= |
Pet levels to 25 with minimal XP lost |
|
|
= |
Additional XP above level 25 is lost |
|
1 Min 45 Sec
15 
2022-02-11 13:55:45
2018-04-13 10:35:42
188,575
High XP
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
His horse really is amazing!
1
Runisco
wrote on 2024-08-08 06:00:06
0
Serpina#2259
wrote on 2024-08-08 21:01:19
1
Runisco
wrote on 2024-08-15 16:08:25
0
JulieD wrote on 2023-10-07 10:00:32
0
Bella123
wrote on 2021-08-01 11:37:28
0
JeremyM wrote on 2022-07-03 20:09:00
0
Fionab wrote on 2023-04-03 12:45:13
2
Tantrik#1441
wrote on 2021-07-04 07:49:28
1
Keglo
wrote on 2021-07-05 06:21:12
2
Morti
wrote on 2021-07-05 10:19:56
0
Malb wrote on 2021-07-05 14:52:33
1
Gráinne
wrote on 2021-07-05 16:37:13
2
Khisanth
wrote on 2021-07-06 04:50:22
But I guess it's more a script problem than a strat issue because doing it manually (Yes, I am a rebel) means you can keep following those steps has you did before.
1
Bella123
wrote on 2021-07-06 09:59:24
0
PureArmour#1184
wrote on 2020-06-09 18:14:43
2
syyina#1944
wrote on 2020-11-07 19:09:35
1
Solitha
wrote on 2021-03-09 23:09:29
0
Neit
wrote on 2020-12-12 12:02:00
2
Solitha
wrote on 2021-03-09 23:04:42
That said, good that you posted the screenshots, because it's easy to see exactly why it failed there. (edited)
-1
Becky wrote on 2021-01-04 05:44:27
3
Chocajules#1428
wrote on 2021-01-04 16:37:09
3
Abi#11305
wrote on 2021-01-04 23:06:45
0
kamalii63#1797
wrote on 2021-02-04 13:49:39
1
Solitha
wrote on 2021-03-09 22:56:20
1
Dorelei wrote on 2021-01-09 17:55:40
1
Solitha
wrote on 2021-03-09 22:51:54
This is assuming you have a rare-quality Broom. That is essential. An uncommon version has the same speed as Syd and may lose the advantage. (edited)
1
Xiem#1779
wrote on 2020-11-01 14:28:41
0
Abi#11305
wrote on 2020-11-03 06:38:04
0
Sadeeva wrote on 2020-12-07 13:23:50
0
Othros wrote on 2020-12-09 17:08:41
2
Jump
wrote on 2020-12-07 09:50:16
1
Jana wrote on 2020-12-06 11:29:40
1
kess wrote on 2020-04-10 17:20:04
1
BeckyRus
wrote on 2020-10-10 16:56:19
4
cellardwellar
wrote on 2020-04-05 03:45:14
-3
Evil
wrote on 2020-01-07 23:46:16
2nd pet is either:
- Unobtainable
- You have to buy one for IRL money / battlenet currency -> a lot of gold
(And if you CAN'T buy some pet on AH / the price is just HUGE, I don't see the point tbh...)
As much as i like the strategy and i would like to give it 5 out of 5, my argument above makes me want to give it 2 or 3 out of 5
So i will just not vote :P (edited)
4
DragonsAfterDark
wrote on 2020-01-08 03:03:19
The Lil' XT, which is the shop pet, is not currently attainable as they've removed it from the shop.
Landro's Lil' XT is a Trading Card Game pet that CAN be bought on the AH. It has the same move set, and almost the same stats.
(edited)
1
DragonsAfterDark
wrote on 2020-01-08 04:27:08
It's your prerogative to make strats as you see fit, just as it's someone else's to make theirs as they'd like, and with what pets they like. There are 20 published strats for this fight. If someone can't find a strategy amongst those with the pets they have, then it's up to the person to expand their roster if they truly want to do the fight.
1
Evil
wrote on 2020-01-08 04:33:12
"A strat should be rated on how effective it is at beating the enemy, not based on your roster."
If you are not very good with pet battles / Can't afford the Shop Pet/"Unobtainable Pet"
-> Then you can not really use the strategy, can you? Means it is 0 effective to you.
And we should make strats friendly to "less advanced pet battlers" or am i wrong?
PS: When i am making strategies, i just want them to be friendly to as many people as possible, reason why making/testing some of them takes 5 hours... (without using pets rather hard to get)
0
Evil
wrote on 2020-01-08 04:45:45
Well, not gonna "argue with the moderator" :P
Personally when i see the strategy with Unobtainable Pets "ON TOP" i move on to the next one.
(I am also pretty sure that A LOT of people think/do the same)
I just downvoted my own strategy to make the new one with similiar pets, but imo as good/better, and the pets are more accessible...
...and then somebody voted 1 out of 5 without giving any arguments.
(so i guess i will vote on this strategy after all)
3
Shenk
wrote on 2020-01-08 07:17:48
3
PureArmour#1184
wrote on 2020-03-01 15:11:50
3
PureArmour#1184
wrote on 2020-03-01 15:15:20
0
Wicked wrote on 2020-02-04 03:41:47
2
Gráinne
wrote on 2020-02-04 14:01:48
My XT took one Trample crit, in R5, and was rather low when I swapped it out. It could be that taking a Feed crit in R3 might be a problem, but you'd have to be very unlucky to suffer that 5 times in a row.
1
Wicked wrote on 2020-02-05 14:19:23
1
Rys wrote on 2019-10-08 16:39:36
2
Eekwibble
wrote on 2018-09-06 02:20:33
change(#3) [ self.ability(#3).duration=4 ]
ability(Sweep:457) [ round=1 ]
change(#2) [ enemy.round>1 ]
ability(Heartbroken:279) [ enemy(#3).active ]
ability(Tympanic Tantrum:387) [ enemy(#3).active ]
ability(Wind-Up:459) [ enemy(#2).active ]
ability(Wind-Up:459) [ !self.aura(Wind-Up:458).exists ]
ability(#1)
change(#1)
1
Yakumile
wrote on 2018-05-08 16:30:38
0
DavidG wrote on 2018-02-10 19:34:47
I know I can specify pets by "enemy(#3)" but for the sake of readability, I've been using "enemy(Otto)" instead. That doesn't work here: "enemy(Mr. Pointy)" throws a script error because of the period in the pet name. Is there a workaround for this, or do I just have to use "enemy(#2)" in this case.
0
Teck wrote on 2017-07-04 16:52:19
This script includes Thaliana's adjustement with an additional Zap, switching to level pet after XT dies and one less Batter.
if [enemy(#1).active]
ability(Sweep) [enemy.round=1]
ability(Wind-Up) [self.round=1]
ability(Batter) [self.round=2]
ability(Batter) [self.round=3]
endif
if [enemy(#2).active]
ability(Wind-Up) [enemy.round=1]
endif
if [enemy(#3).active]
change(#2)
endif
if [self(#2).active]
ability(Heartbroken) [self.round=1]
ability(Tympanic Tantrum) [self.round=2]
ability(Zap) [self.round=6]
ability(Zap) [self.round=7]
change(#3)
endif
if [self(#3).active]
change(#2)
endif
change(#1)
0
Teck wrote on 2017-08-06 07:37:51
if [enemy(#1).active]
ability(Sweep) [enemy.round=1]
ability(Wind-Up) [self.round=1]
ability(Batter) [self.round=2]
ability(Batter) [self.round=3]
endif
if [enemy(#2).active]
ability(Wind-Up) [enemy.round=1]
endif
if [enemy(#3).active]
change(#2)
endif
if [self(#2).active]
ability(Heartbroken) [self.round=1]
ability(Tympanic Tantrum) [self.round=2]
ability(Zap)
change(#3) [self(#2).dead]
endif
if [self(#3).active]
change(#2)
endif
change(#1)
0
Thaliana wrote on 2017-07-04 07:35:03
1
Eekwibble wrote on 2017-06-09 23:01:07
0
Abi wrote on 2017-05-07 05:45:06
0
Macgam wrote on 2017-01-03 11:43:43
0
Calyndra wrote on 2017-03-09 13:22:12
0
Cohibadad wrote on 2017-01-02 11:27:21
0
Malbaratar wrote on 2017-01-03 12:18:00
0
Cohibadad wrote on 2017-01-03 13:29:15
0
Anonymous wrote on 2017-03-05 11:53:25
0
Frans wrote on 2020-12-07 08:34:46
1
Блуди
wrote on 2020-12-06 05:27:08
New Comment: