超強人形組合! | 龍族天下! | 成群飛行 | 小小死靈法師 | 膽小爾致命 |
魔法大師 | ![]() | Best of the Beasts | 水棲部隊 | 機械專家 |
1
1
平均評分: |
5 |
評分: |
4 |
你的投票: |
|
Creator |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Tags
Filter strategies:
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
![]()
任何等級 20+ 元素
|
![]()
Script thanks to Thordros
|
Script |
2 | 4.4 ![]() |
N/A | 37 ![]() |
120
![]()
2:00
|
16 | |
![]()
任何等級 25+ 元素
|
Script |
2 | 4.7 ![]() |
N/A | 7 ![]() |
111
![]()
1:51
|
16 | ||
|
![]()
DragonsAfterDark: Strategy updated 15 August 22 with new pets
Script thanks to Alayea |
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
N/A | 1 ![]() |
119
![]()
1:59
|
16+ | |
![]()
Updated 2 June 22 with new pets.
I wasn't a fan of the damage variation on Chomp, which introduced an unnecessary element of RNG to the strat. I swapped it out for the Jade Tentacle. Scratch has a flat damage, and between Shell Shield and Thorns it keeps Mist Wraith from doing too much damage to the Tentacle, and mitigates healing from Plagued Blood. Ratings have been reset. |
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
N/A | 3 ![]() |
115
![]()
1:55
|
17+ | ||
![]()
Strategy updated and script added 17 December 23
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
N/A | 3 ![]() |
110
![]()
1:50
|
16-17 | ||
![]()
Takes a minute but will work 100% of the time.
|
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
N/A | 2 ![]() |
265
![]()
4:25
|
29+ | |||
![]()
Could be close at the end as both number 3 pets have the same speed. But strategy worked a few times in a row for me.
|
RNG |
2 | 4.5 ![]() |
N/A | 2 ![]() |
118
![]()
1:58
|
17 | ||
![]()
任何等級 25+ 元素
|
2 | 4.5 ![]() |
N/A | 3 ![]() |
185
![]()
3:05
|
25 |
包括步驟
Substitutes:
1 / 2
DragonsAfterDark: Strategy updated 15 August 22 with new pets
Script thanks to Alayea
之前 | 之後 | 獲得經驗值 | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ➜ | 13 | 5981 |
2 | ➜ | 13 | 6353 |
3 | ➜ | 14 | 6683 |
4 | ➜ | 14 | 6971 |
5 | ➜ | 14 | 7219 |
6 | ➜ | 15 | 7425 |
7 | ➜ | 15 | 7590 |
8 | ➜ | 16 | 7714 |
9 | ➜ | 16 | 7796 |
10 | ➜ | 17 | 7838 |
11 | ➜ | 17 | 7838 |
12 | ➜ | 18 | 7796 |
13 | ➜ | 19 | 7714 |
14 | ➜ | 19 | 7590 |
15 | ➜ | 20 | 7425 |
16 | ➜ | 20 | 7219 |
17 | ➜ | 21 | 6971 |
18 | ➜ | 22 | 6683 |
19 | ➜ | 22 | 6353 |
20 | ➜ | 23 | 5981 |
21 | ➜ | 23 | 5569 |
22 | ➜ | 24 | 5115 |
23 | ➜ | 25 | 3900 |
24 | ➜ | 25 | 1980 |
狩旅團之帽 |
|
小寵物點心 |
|
寵物點心 |
|
暗月禮帽 |
|
寵物對戰獎勵事件 |
= |
將寵物等級提升至25級並最小化經驗損失的方法 |
|
= |
獲得 |
|
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
I somehow question his abilities as a trapper, considering most of his pets are not exactly alive.
1
ApolloGiant#1378
發表在 2023-04-27 19:48:05
2
Alayea
發表在 2022-11-14 23:17:57
__________
Note: I separated out Mist Wraith's Undead round because there's always the small chance that Aldrusian Sapling could land a critical strike, resulting in triggering MW's undead aura a round early.
standby [enemy(Crawdead:1869).aura(Undead:242).exists]
if [self(Aldrusian Sproutling:2433).active & enemy(Mist Wraith:1868).aura(Undead:242).exists]
use(Plant:303)
endif
if [self(Cinderweb Recluse:2087).active & enemy(Crawdead:1869).active]
use(Skitter:626)
endif
if [self(Cinderweb Recluse:2087).active & enemy(Gnaw:1870).hpp=100]
use(Brittle Webbing:382)
endif
use(Plant:303) [round=3]
use(Scratch:119)
use(Skitter:626)
use(Dive:564)
use(Water Jet:118)
change(next)
(已編輯)
1
TobeDeleted#2852
發表在 2022-07-19 10:33:04
1
Irix
發表在 2021-01-16 13:58:58
1
ssfiit
發表在 2020-09-12 14:00:02
3
DragonsAfterDark
發表在 2018-04-19 13:48:46
The fight basically went the same as it did with the Earth Spirit, but the one hit I could get in on Crawdead was more powerful with Skitter than Stone Shot, and that seemed to make the difference. Water Spirit had enough health to properly finish Gnaw.
1
DuelDragun#1972
發表在 2020-05-15 10:16:38
1
Simca 發表在 2017-05-06 00:10:17
The problem with the listed strategy is that Bone Bite (Crawdead's main attack) has a HUGE variance range. If his two attacks on your PWS are in the upper portion of his damage range, then the next pet (Gnaw) will end up killing your PWS before Geyser goes off. This means the chance of failure for the strategy as currently listed is actually very high (probably around 50%). There's a couple ways to work around this.
The one I found best was the suggestion below about replacing Fel Flame with a Core Hound Pup; even my level 20 Core Hound Pup put up a wildly better showing than Fel Flame did. He ended up killing Crawdead by himself entirely, even when he got some very high hits from Crawdead's main ability. I used Howl -> Scratch -> Scratch -> Scratch. Presumably, at this point, if my pet was level 25 (and I hadn't gotten horrendously unlucky), I could even lead off against Gnaw with a Burrow. However, that ultimately proved to be optional, as PWS solo'd Gnaw even with the Geyser build.
Replacing Whirlpool with Geyser will likely also work, as the stun from Geyser does not even play a role in this fight under any case, making Whirlpool a clearly better option. However, without a more solid second pet, you run a higher risk of losing PWS against Gnaw from unlucky crits. Still, simply swapping to Whirlpool should drop the failure rate down substantially for this strategy.
0
David G 發表在 2017-02-05 21:50:09
2
MessÃaz - Nemesis 發表在 2016-09-25 02:09:18
0
Szuzsika 發表在 2016-10-18 10:25:26
0
Gráinne
發表在 2016-10-18 10:48:28
0
X 發表在 2016-10-18 14:09:00
0
Annoyed 發表在 2017-01-22 13:23:08
0
Hermy 發表在 2016-10-18 11:52:23
0
soul 發表在 2016-09-04 04:52:32
0
Aranesh
發表在 2016-09-04 01:17:47
I used your adjustments, they make the strategy work fine :) Thank you!!
新留言