Strategy added by trogdor
19
19
Average rating: |
4.6 |
Ratings: |
17 |
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters. |
|||||||||
Script |
2 | 5.0 | 100% | 45 | 73
1:13
|
10 | |||
Script |
2 | 4.9 | 99% | 108 | 135
2:15
|
18 | |||
The Enchanted Tuskling will use either Ethereal or Expunge on round 1, then use them on CD from there. If they use Expunge first this strategy will be 10 rounds. If they use Ethereal first it will be 12.
Video for Fight |
Breed Script |
2 | 4.9 | 96% | 46 | 85
1:25
|
10-12 | ||
Script |
2 | 4.6 | 94% | 19 | 84
1:24
|
11+ | |||
Script thanks to Calipso
|
Script |
2 | 4.7 | 100% | 8 | 91
1:31
|
12+ | ||
Script |
2 | 4.4 | 100% | 11 | 73
1:13
|
10-11 | |||
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
RNG Level 1+ Script |
2 | 4.2 | 28% | 10 | 155
2:35
|
18+ | ||
2nd pet must be Dragon.
#3 pet must be above 288 power. Any #1 ability works; although I suggest: Punch or Stone Rush |
Breed Script |
2 | 5.0 | 100% | 1 | 68
1:08
|
9 | ||
Fast and easy, enjoy :)
------------------------ Fight time: 14-15 rounds ------------------------ |
2 | 5.0 | N/A | 2 | 103
1:43
|
14-15 | |||
Breed Script |
2 | 5.0 | 100% | 0 | 70
1:10
|
9 | |||
Don't have all the Iron Starlette Breeds, so I could only test the more powerful ones and therefore set a Power requirement. I prefer those with less HP.
|
Breed Script |
2 | 4.8 | 100% | 5 | 92
1:32
|
12 | ||
2 | 4.7 | N/A | 1 | 122
2:02
|
16 | ||||
Had success with either a PS or PP Iron Starlette
It seems like sometimes Iron Starlette will die a round early, this doesn't change much it will just mean adding a second Scorched Earth with Firewing, and maybe a second Savage Talon to finish the fight |
RNG Script |
2 | 2.3 | 95% | 1 | 114
1:54
|
14+ | ||
Script |
2 | 0.0 | 100% | 0 | 84
1:24
|
10-11 | |||
Script |
2 | 0.0 | 100% | 0 | 145
2:25
|
17+ |
Incl. steps:
Skills: 2 * *
Breed: Any
Breed | Health | Power | Speed |
---|---|---|---|
HH | 1806 | 276 | 227 |
PS | 1481 | 305 | 257 |
Substitutes:
1 / 2
1 / 6
Iron Starlette | PP |
Scourged Whelpling | HH |
Long-Eared Owl | BB |
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Pretty inflammable attitude right there
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsmraymus
wrote on 2023-11-05 20:46:19
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsCoffe#21587
wrote on 2023-07-24 15:54:27
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsTessriel
wrote on 2023-04-01 08:41:42
This strategy can fail if Lord Flappinsby gets a crit off.(edited)2
You must be logged in to vote on comments(OP) trogdor
wrote on 2023-04-01 17:12:39
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsGráinne
wrote on 2023-04-01 20:20:38
As a practical matter, it's a PITA to calculate the fail chance of a given strat. You can do it, but most people don't. So the site doesn't have an objective standard for what needs an RNG tag. I'm inclined to think it should depend on the difficulty of the battle.
My own mental guideline in the early days was that a normal WQ type strat definitely needs an RNG tag when its fail chance is 5% or more, and an awkward challenge-type battle, like Family, has more leeway.
But as a few people have become much more experienced and savvy about validating and testing strats, the expected standard has been raised. When I see a strat from Mutanis or DragonsAfterDark or Lazey or a handful of others, I know that any fail chance is going to be less than I'm ever likely to notice.
2
You must be logged in to vote on comments(OP) trogdor
wrote on 2023-04-15 05:51:06
Is it bad form to update this strat with a new pet after publishing? Should I make yet another strat instead? @Aranesh
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsGráinne
wrote on 2023-04-15 12:48:17
The only downside that I see - and this is not just confined to your strat - is that when I look at the full list of strats above, I see almost the same pets in every strat, in the same pattern.
So the site isn't providing a lot of variation on this one :)
But that is not your problem, as a indivisual strat creator.
New Comment: