19
19
平均評分: |
4.6 |
評分: |
17 |
你的投票: |
|
Creator |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters. |
||||||||||
1 | Script |
2 | 5.0 | 40 | 73
1:13
|
10 | ||||
2 | Script |
2 | 4.9 | 100 | 135
2:15
|
18 | ||||
3 |
The Enchanted Tuskling will use either Ethereal or Expunge on round 1, then use them on CD from there. If they use Expunge first this strategy will be 10 rounds. If they use Ethereal first it will be 12.
Video for Fight |
屬性 Script |
2 | 4.9 | 46 | 85
1:25
|
10-12 | |||
4 | Script |
2 | 4.6 | 19 | 84
1:24
|
11+ | ||||
5 |
Script thanks to Calipso
|
Script |
2 | 4.7 | 8 | 91
1:31
|
12+ | |||
6 | Script |
2 | 4.4 | 11 | 73
1:13
|
10-11 | ||||
7 |
任何等級 1+ 寵物
|
RNG 等級 1+ Script |
2 | 4.0 | 10 | 155
2:35
|
18+ | |||
8 |
Fast and easy, enjoy :)
------------------------ Fight time: 14-15 rounds ------------------------ |
2 | 5.0 | 2 | 103
1:43
|
14-15 | ||||
9 |
Don't have all the 小鋼鐵之星 Breeds, so I could only test the more powerful ones and therefore set a Power requirement. I prefer those with less HP.
|
屬性 Script |
2 | 4.8 | 5 | 92
1:32
|
12 | |||
10 | 2 | 4.7 | 1 | 122
2:02
|
16 | |||||
11 |
Modified:
Now; 9 rounds, ~1:10 2nd pet must be Dragon |
屬性 Script |
2 | 4.5 | 0 | 80
1:20
|
10+ | |||
12 | RNG Script |
2 | 2.3 | 1 | 114
1:54
|
14+ | ||||
13 | Script |
0
New
|
0.0 | 0 | 84
1:24
|
10-11 |
包括步驟
Substitutes:
1 / 2
1 / 6
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Pretty inflammable attitude right there
1
先登入才可以評論mraymus
發表在 2023-11-05 20:46:19
1
先登入才可以評論Coffe#21587
發表在 2023-07-24 15:54:27
1
先登入才可以評論Tessriel
發表在 2023-04-01 08:41:42
This strategy can fail if Lord Flappinsby gets a crit off.(edited)2
先登入才可以評論(OP) trogdor
發表在 2023-04-01 17:12:39
1
先登入才可以評論Gráinne
發表在 2023-04-01 20:20:38
As a practical matter, it's a PITA to calculate the fail chance of a given strat. You can do it, but most people don't. So the site doesn't have an objective standard for what needs an RNG tag. I'm inclined to think it should depend on the difficulty of the battle.
My own mental guideline in the early days was that a normal WQ type strat definitely needs an RNG tag when its fail chance is 5% or more, and an awkward challenge-type battle, like Family, has more leeway.
But as a few people have become much more experienced and savvy about validating and testing strats, the expected standard has been raised. When I see a strat from Mutanis or DragonsAfterDark or Lazey or a handful of others, I know that any fail chance is going to be less than I'm ever likely to notice.
2
先登入才可以評論(OP) trogdor
發表在 2023-04-15 05:51:06
Is it bad form to update this strat with a new pet after publishing? Should I make yet another strat instead? @Aranesh
2
先登入才可以評論Gráinne
發表在 2023-04-15 12:48:17
The only downside that I see - and this is not just confined to your strat - is that when I look at the full list of strats above, I see almost the same pets in every strat, in the same pattern.
So the site isn't providing a lot of variation on this one :)
But that is not your problem, as a indivisual strat creator.
新留言