35
35
|
Average rating: |
4.1 |
|
Ratings: |
53 |
|
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters.
|
 |
|||||||
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Thank you to Rysana for the feedback on the Mawsworn Minion ^^
Video for Fight |
Level 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0  |
N/A | 18  |
180
3:00
|
23 | |
|
Script |
2 | 4.9 |
N/A | 20 |
100
1:40
|
13 | ||
|
The script is set for a level pet to come in. When choosing a level pet, make sure it can stand a couple rounds of Arcane Explosion.
|
Script |
2 | 4.7 |
N/A | 16 |
98
1:38
|
13+ | |
|
Alt pets in comments
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 6 |
65
1:05
|
8 | |
|
Any Level 10+ Pet
|
Don't use any attacks that can swap the enemy pet with your leveling one.
|
Level 10+ Script |
2 | 4.1 |
N/A | 35 |
165
2:45
|
21+ | |
Any Pet
|
Strategy by Scyllaxs on wowhead, who used Elekk Plushie as a third pet: https://www.wowhead.com/npc=66819/brok#comments:id=2096463
I added the TD script for automation purposes. |
Script |
2 | 4.8 |
N/A | 3 |
170
2:50
|
21 | |
|
|
|
Script |
2 | 4.6 |
N/A | 7 |
160
2:40
|
22 | |
Any Pet
|
Script |
2 | 4.4 |
N/A | 4 |
119
1:59
|
16+ | ||
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
There is a bit of RNG in this strategy due to the use of Sandstorm, but usually it still works if you miss once or twice. I haven't found a better solution to deal with the extremely high speed Arcane Explosion so I hope you can understand.
Also please note the P/P breed of the Shore Butterfly. I know that S/S doesn't work, but I'm not sure about the other ones. |
Breed RNG Level 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 1 |
130
2:10
|
18+ | |
|
Any Level 5+ Pet
|
Level 5+ Script |
2 | 4.5 |
N/A | 1 |
160
2:40
|
22+ |
Incl. steps:
Any Level 10+ Pet
 >700 |
Don't use any attacks that can swap the enemy pet with your leveling one.
| Before | After | Experience Gain | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ➜ | 10 | 3589 |
| 2 | ➜ | 11 | 3812 |
| 3 | ➜ | 11 | 4010 |
| 4 | ➜ | 11 | 4183 |
| 5 | ➜ | 12 | 4331 |
| 6 | ➜ | 12 | 4455 |
| 7 | ➜ | 13 | 4554 |
| 8 | ➜ | 13 | 4628 |
| 9 | ➜ | 14 | 4678 |
| 10 | ➜ | 14 | 4703 |
| 11 | ➜ | 15 | 4703 |
| 12 | ➜ | 16 | 4678 |
| 13 | ➜ | 17 | 4628 |
| 14 | ➜ | 17 | 4554 |
| 15 | ➜ | 18 | 4455 |
| 16 | ➜ | 19 | 4331 |
| 17 | ➜ | 19 | 4183 |
| 18 | ➜ | 20 | 4010 |
| 19 | ➜ | 21 | 3812 |
| 20 | ➜ | 22 | 3589 |
| 21 | ➜ | 22 | 3341 |
| 22 | ➜ | 23 | 3069 |
| 23 | ➜ | 24 | 2772 |
| 24 | ➜ | 25 | 1980 |
|
Safari Hat |
|
|
Lesser Pet Treat |
|
|
Pet Treat |
|
|
Darkmoon Hat |
|
|
Pet Battle Week |
|
= |
Pet levels to 25 with minimal XP lost |
|
|
= |
Additional XP above level 25 is lost |
|
2 Min 45 Sec
21+ 
2021-12-30 23:09:05
2018-09-30 05:41:19
147,672
Medium XP
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
He seems very close to nature.
4
CompilerTries
wrote on 2024-04-14 00:53:09
I attempted with my minimal knowledge of writing scripts to try to modify the original and the following worked for me:
standby [round=1]
change(#2) [round=2]
ability(Emerald Presence:597) [self.aura(Emerald Presence:823).duration<2]
ability(Proto-Strike:612)
if[enemy(Ashtail:981).hp<666]
ability(Sandstorm:453)
endif
ability(#1)
change(next)
If this works or doesn't work for you please let me know and I will try to revise it.
0
JaxMugen8 wrote on 2024-08-16 04:05:27
1
Tequima
wrote on 2024-11-25 19:25:15
2
Seed#2231
wrote on 2024-10-26 05:03:50
-2
SlackMartin
wrote on 2023-09-05 14:54:32
9
Gráinne
wrote on 2023-09-05 19:06:36
If the strat failed for you, and you want your comment to be taken seriously:
1. Specify EXACTLY which species and breeds you used.
2. Specify whether you read the strategy from the site and executed it manually, or downloaded and used the tdScript.
3. Specify EXACTLY where the first unexpected thing happened, the first thing that deviated from what the strat predicts. What died too early? What didn't die when it was supposed to? What attack missed?
4. If possible, provide a log. You can see your log in the Pet Battle tab of your chat box. You can pull that out, make it bigger, screenshot it. Better still, you can use the addon Battle Pet Log Keeper from Curseforge, and do /pblk and Save Battle when the battle you want to log is complete.
Almost any strat can fail to a really unlucky string of crits, and some difficult challenge strats like the Family ones may fail more than anyone likes, but the people behind this site do their best to promote well-working strats. Do your part. Provide useful information.
-1
SlackMartin
wrote on 2023-09-06 23:18:07
5
Gráinne
wrote on 2023-09-07 02:14:35
And not every strat is sufficiently reliable, and sometimes can be improved by accurate and specific reports of the conditions where they go wrong, so that the strat setters and curators, and other regulars who help out, can take them into account.
But it's also VERY common for people who Did It Wrong to type up a one-liner claiming that a strat doesn't work when the issue was PEBCAK. I came here to check out the strat that you made the comment about, and see that I already checked it out a year ago.
So, if you genuinely have found an error in a strat, by all means point it out, but be specific, so that even if you did it right, people don't waste time trying to find the rare failure conditions.
1
thebl4ckd0g
wrote on 2024-02-03 23:19:47
1
Nina#1867
wrote on 2023-09-07 01:41:23
2
Netbug wrote on 2022-07-22 16:31:04
4
Gráinne
wrote on 2022-07-22 18:14:02
From the numbers, I can't see how it's possible for the EPW to die before killing Kali, even with bad RNG. (And I was using a P/S EPW just to check it; a P/P would have been better.)
I think you must have made a mistake somewhere.
2
Lorna
wrote on 2023-04-09 15:31:41
1
Tulaash
wrote on 2023-08-23 00:22:42
1
mjmeowy#2656
wrote on 2023-08-15 15:44:47
0
CharlyCat wrote on 2023-01-11 18:42:20
1
Ta
wrote on 2021-04-08 03:19:37
14
Skwirrel
wrote on 2020-10-19 08:17:28
change(#2) [self(#1).active]
use(Emerald Presence:597) [self.aura(Emerald Presence:823).duration<=1]
use(Proto-Strike:612)
use(Breath:115)
change(#3)
use(Sandstorm:453)
use(Crush:406)
use(#1)
1
eThi#2528
wrote on 2020-11-13 19:05:25
0
Malachi wrote on 2019-08-25 07:45:41
Edit: Plus, I don't think there are any level 1 pets with 700 hp... (edited)
1
Nyari
wrote on 2020-10-22 15:17:54
That's true. I've raised the required level a little bit.
2
Sneezer
wrote on 2020-10-18 16:32:23
1
NoBueno
wrote on 2020-10-18 22:06:28
0
Baddcat wrote on 2018-11-18 11:35:58
1
(OP) Malhado
wrote on 2019-11-07 23:08:38
1
Skinny wrote on 2018-12-26 23:52:09
change(Emerald Proto-Whelp:1167) [self(Anubisath Idol:1155).dead]
if [enemy(Kali:982).active]
change(Anubisath Idol:1155) [self(#1).played]
use(Deflection:490) [enemy(Kali:982).ability(Flash:463).usable]
use(Crush:406)
use(#1)
endif
if [enemy(Ashtail:981).active]
use(Sandstorm:453)
use(Crush:406)
endif
use(Emerald Presence:597) [self.aura(Emerald Presence:823).duration<2]
use(Emerald Dream:598)
use(#1)
1
(OP) Malhado
wrote on 2019-11-07 23:08:22
1
Freydis#2861
wrote on 2018-12-11 18:37:37
1
(OP) Malhado
wrote on 2019-11-07 23:07:30
1
milo
wrote on 2018-12-31 23:15:00
2
milo
wrote on 2018-12-31 23:23:20
1
(OP) Malhado
wrote on 2019-10-18 10:21:54
1
(OP) Malhado
wrote on 2019-11-07 23:06:52
2
Julillia#1750
wrote on 2018-11-24 01:16:09
New Comment: