Strategia aggiunta da DragonsAfterDark
53
53
Average rating: |
4.7 |
Ratings: |
39 |
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Tags
Filter strategies:
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
![]()
Fight time: 2:15-2:20 on 17-18 rounds
|
Script |
2 | 4.9 ![]() |
100% | 126 ![]() |
145
![]()
2:25
|
18 | ||
![]()
Blizzard pushed changes to this fight on Tuesday, 21 January. I've updated the steps & script to reflect the changes.
|
Script |
2 | 4.7 ![]() |
100% | 53 ![]() |
192
![]()
3:12
|
24 | ||
Script Scelta dallo Staff |
2 | 4.5 ![]() |
100% | 67 ![]() |
198
![]()
3:18
|
24 | |||
![]()
Time: ~2min (~12 rounds)
Tested 26 April 2021 |
Script |
2 | 4.7 ![]() |
100% | 13 ![]() |
140
![]()
2:20
|
12-13 | ||
![]()
This is my first strategy and it's heavily based on the strategy from Thuggy2119. Instead of going with 2 Sky-Bos, I used a Zeppelin di Lunacupa since it too has Esca. From my understanding, you really just need 3 pets with Esca and you'll be fine. Miniserpe Volante Meccanica is nice because it also has Dardo del Tuono which is strong against Mechanical pets. This strategy negates most of the RNG. Thanks to Onuava for the TD script. This strat still works in Shadowlands.
|
Script |
2 | 4.4 ![]() |
100% | 41 ![]() |
270
![]()
4:30
|
38+ | ||
![]()
Always keep the heal up on the first pet.
The second pet that comes in will be random you can easily adapt your fight with it. I hope i helped you and may my engllish not be too confiusing :) |
RNG |
2 | 4.4 ![]() |
N/A | 8 ![]() |
238
![]()
3:58
|
28 | ||
Negozio Script Non più ottenibile |
2 | 4.0 ![]() |
100% | 7 ![]() |
305
![]()
5:05
|
36 | |||
![]()
A tricky, tricky hard mode fight. Follow on your sole responsibility as these are difficult to test in 100%.
For this one, you are carried by blizzard, ignore logic and try to avert math. All lowercase right? (This strat's been created for two purposes: one wanting to do hard mode other than decoys and the other using each of "almost-favourite" pets of two people. :P It's been long in hiatus because of a mix of overdoing it and the nerfs… especially the former.) |
Tipo Difficile |
2 | 4.4 ![]() |
N/A | 4 ![]() |
150
![]()
2:30
|
13-15 | ||
![]()
I cannot give a more specific move order, because it depends on the RNG from Logic and Math.
Two key points: Logic must be killed before Apocalypse hits and Soul of the Forge should preferably take the Apocalypse hit and Beetle will easy kill Math. Otherwise it should be a pretty waterproof strategy. It has worked for me 10 out of 10 so far for me. (Thanks to Gráinne for making the strategy better with some good advice!) |
RNG |
2 | 3.7 ![]() |
N/A | 8 ![]() |
130
![]()
2:10
|
18+ | ||
![]()
Actually you need 3 elemental pets with Photosynthesis and Sunlight. Battle'll be a little long but has stable winning result.
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 1 ![]() |
330
![]()
5:30
|
46 | ||
Tipo Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 3 ![]() |
135
![]()
2:15
|
11-13 | |||
![]()
A crib of Mutanis's Strat Here
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 1 ![]() |
125
![]()
2:05
|
11-12 | ||
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
99% | 1 ![]() |
120
![]()
2:00
|
14+ | |||
![]()
Found this somewhere, i have been using it for awhile now with great succes. It would be much apriciated if someone could write a TD script for this fight :D
|
Tipo |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
N/A | 0 ![]() |
155
![]()
2:35
|
21 | ||
![]()
You can use 3 Mechanical Pandaren Dragonling, then second pet can never come or use any pet with Decoy + any strong ability.
TD script kindly provided by Lazey. |
Script |
2 | 4.3 ![]() |
100% | 6 ![]() |
260
![]()
4:20
|
36+ | ||
![]()
Usually wins around round 15. Enemy crits do not appear to be an issue.
|
RNG Script |
2 | 4.0 ![]() |
99% | 3 ![]() |
146
![]()
2:26
|
17 | ||
![]()
Time: 2:00-2:20 (~18-20 rounds)
Tested 10/14/2020 |
Script |
2 | 4.2 ![]() |
100% | 1 ![]() |
146
![]()
2:26
|
18-20 | ||
Tipo RNG |
2 | 1.0 ![]() |
N/A | 2 ![]() |
118
![]()
1:58
|
13+ | |||
RNG Script |
2 | 2.6 ![]() |
47% | 4 ![]() |
135
![]()
2:15
|
15-19 | |||
Script |
2 | 0.0 ![]() |
100% | 0 ![]() |
240
![]()
4:00
|
32+ | |||
![]()
You need your third pet's HP to be higher than your PHA7-YNX's.
|
Tipo RNG Script |
2 | 0.0 ![]() |
17% | 0 ![]() |
145
![]()
2:25
|
13-16 | ||
RNG |
2 | 2.5 ![]() |
N/A | 0 ![]() |
175
![]()
2:55
|
21-24 | |||
![]()
Low cost strat, working but rng heavy depending on the enemy misses due to Stench.
> Not recommended for heroic tries. < Tested with a H/H beetle. Script thanks to Glyndorn |
RNG Script |
2 | 2.3 ![]() |
60% | 0 ![]() |
145
![]()
2:25
|
18 | ||
RNG Script |
2 | 1.2 ![]() |
26% | 1 ![]() |
230
![]()
3:50
|
27-28 |
Includi Passaggi:
Substitutes:
1 / 15
Blizzard pushed changes to this fight on Tuesday, 21 January. I've updated the steps & script to reflect the changes.
Prima | Dopo | Esperienza Guadagnata | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ➜ | 9 | 2871 |
2 | ➜ | 10 | 3049 |
3 | ➜ | 10 | 3208 |
4 | ➜ | 10 | 3346 |
5 | ➜ | 11 | 3465 |
6 | ➜ | 11 | 3564 |
7 | ➜ | 12 | 3643 |
8 | ➜ | 12 | 3703 |
9 | ➜ | 13 | 3742 |
10 | ➜ | 14 | 3762 |
11 | ➜ | 14 | 3762 |
12 | ➜ | 15 | 3742 |
13 | ➜ | 16 | 3703 |
14 | ➜ | 17 | 3643 |
15 | ➜ | 17 | 3564 |
16 | ➜ | 18 | 3465 |
17 | ➜ | 19 | 3346 |
18 | ➜ | 20 | 3208 |
19 | ➜ | 20 | 3049 |
20 | ➜ | 21 | 2871 |
21 | ➜ | 22 | 2673 |
22 | ➜ | 23 | 2455 |
23 | ➜ | 24 | 2218 |
24 | ➜ | 24 | 1960 |
Cappello da Safari |
|
Integratore Inferiore |
|
Integratore |
|
Cilindro di Lunacupa |
|
Evento bonus: scontri tra mascotte |
= |
Le mascotte livellano fino al 25 con minima XP persa |
|
= |
XP aggiuntiva oltre il livello 25 è persa. |
|
Cucciolo dell'Orgoglio Vorace | PB |
Girasole Canterino | HB |
Coniglio Elfin | BB |
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Not much sky to sing about in here, is there not?
3
Leinia
scritto il 2022-06-10 15:50:37
2
Enzzo#1146
scritto il 2021-02-11 10:47:33
1
TC scritto il 2020-10-25 00:02:46
1
Bruman#1853
scritto il 2020-10-24 17:20:44
1
ysk
scritto il 2020-10-23 14:47:00
3
Shade
scritto il 2020-10-15 02:29:58
3
Euroblood
scritto il 2020-10-16 17:54:55
0
kess scritto il 2020-06-17 10:13:13
-2
Rone scritto il 2020-01-19 21:35:32
4
(OP) DragonsAfterDark
scritto il 2020-01-19 21:48:16
1
Kerviel#1756
scritto il 2020-02-11 17:08:56
1
Daniboone#1872
scritto il 2020-03-13 14:46:07
1
(OP) DragonsAfterDark
scritto il 2020-03-14 12:46:35
7
Rodentia scritto il 2020-02-25 16:11:07
-7
(OP) DragonsAfterDark
scritto il 2020-02-25 16:15:35
9
Gráinne
scritto il 2020-02-25 18:06:24
-8
(OP) DragonsAfterDark
scritto il 2020-02-25 21:11:07
6
Gráinne
scritto il 2020-02-26 05:15:43
3
Shenk
scritto il 2020-02-26 06:48:29
"turn 5+ seethe until dead" but now it doesn't raise any questions?
and as dragons already mentioned; if you actually do follow the instructions instead of spamming the script button you should know the abilities your pet has selected making this discussion pointless (edited)
3
BlueSky
scritto il 2020-02-29 16:41:46
Repeating ability use is often "Turn 5+: ability until dead" or "Turn 2: abillity Turn 3: ability" as separate lines.
It's about consistency with technical writing skills and being as clear as possible with what actions, denoted as turns on separate lines, the player takes.
-3
Shenk
scritto il 2020-02-29 17:35:09
and considering that the most viewed/clicked strategies in the newest sections are made by people mostly using this writing style it would be consistent to stick to it
if it comes to being as clear as possible i think there is no right or wrong way, but as i already stated i find it pretty clear as it is and rather have it in one line than something like this https://www.wow-petguide.com/?Strategy=8048
1
PriestessStefy
scritto il 2020-02-03 15:57:25
I used Broot, Blossoming Ancient, and Singing Sunflower
1: Cast Sunlight
2: Cast Photosynthesis
3. Swap to next pet
4. Repeat
This will be a long fight - but no RNG!
Credit to xchino on WoWhead.
2
Yarv#1980
scritto il 2020-01-25 08:02:51
1
(OP) DragonsAfterDark
scritto il 2020-01-25 13:22:14
1
Wynndra scritto il 2020-01-24 12:36:51
1
Floguna scritto il 2020-01-22 16:52:51
1
Rajvosa scritto il 2020-01-21 12:11:04
2
Destinee
scritto il 2020-01-20 09:08:24
-2
Coltongrundy#1258
scritto il 2020-01-20 00:48:38
6
Gráinne
scritto il 2020-01-20 03:58:37
Also see the addon Pet Battle Log Keeper, that would allow you to reference exactly what happened, if you Save Battle after finishing it.
Also, why did you get "a few" wins? Surely, you needed only one win
0
Fink scritto il 2020-01-18 05:46:15
0
Xaestra scritto il 2020-01-17 21:48:59
1- Decoy
2- Thunderbolt
3- Swap to Next dragonling
0
Sable scritto il 2020-01-17 17:24:36
2
BlueSky
scritto il 2020-01-17 10:43:08
0
Kalaida scritto il 2020-01-16 07:02:59
1
Shatter scritto il 2020-01-15 07:45:21
1
Moolady
scritto il 2020-01-15 13:43:55
2
(OP) DragonsAfterDark
scritto il 2020-01-15 15:28:20
1
kurtlar1971
scritto il 2020-01-15 09:21:14
1
Gráinne
scritto il 2019-11-12 04:11:46
2
Shenk
scritto il 2019-11-12 08:22:36
1
Gráinne
scritto il 2019-11-12 17:13:37
Unless, of course, we've all missed something ...
(edited)
1
Remte
scritto il 2019-12-02 14:47:12
1
Shenk
scritto il 2019-12-02 16:43:27
1
(OP) DragonsAfterDark
scritto il 2019-12-02 17:24:39
1
issiyra#2333
scritto il 2025-02-09 12:17:56
0
Filyarina scritto il 2020-10-25 15:09:56
1
fanzio
scritto il 2020-08-30 16:06:30
0
Аneityum
scritto il 2020-11-10 21:52:36
Nuovo Commento: