Estrategia añadida por Halyanth#1611
24
24
Puntuación media: |
5 |
Puntuaciones: |
16 |
Tu voto: |
|
Creator |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Etiquetas
Filtrar estrategias:
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
![]()
Using no alternatives ensures 5 rounds
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 70 ![]() |
40
![]()
0:40
|
5+ | ||
![]()
Cualquier nivel 1+ Mascota
|
![]()
I was able to take a level 1 battle pet to level 6 (45% into level 6) with the Safari Hat (only)
Tried with a second battle pet, with hat and both treats, raised its level to 7 (1610xp). This might be a viable option during the Pet Battle bonus weeks for power-leveling pets. Will investigate the xp gain, during the next PBBW. Also further information regarding power leveling from Arji: XP with Sign of the Critter, Hat and WQ up: My leveling pet got 2268XP - Repeating the fight after the WQ was already complete a level 1 pet got 1827 XP (8 Levels) edit - script added. Thank you DragonAfterDark Edit - Based on Feedback below script has been changed, and strategy updated. |
Nivel 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
99% | 24 ![]() |
75
![]()
1:15
|
8-12 | |
![]()
Cualquier mascota
|
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
N/A | 18 ![]() |
49
![]()
0:49
|
6 | |||
![]()
Cualquier nivel 1+ Mascota
|
![]()
Dragonizo mecánico intemporal can work as alt #2 but ~2% chance it fails
|
Nivel 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 34 ![]() |
45
![]()
0:45
|
6 | |
![]()
Cualquier nivel 25+ Mascota
|
Script |
2 | 4.9 ![]() |
100% | 75 ![]() |
68
![]()
1:08
|
6+ | ||
![]()
Cualquier nivel 1+ Mascota
|
![]()
Dragonizo mecánico intemporal can work as alt #2 but 1% chance it fails.
|
Nivel 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 8 ![]() |
47
![]()
0:47
|
5 | |
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 2 ![]() |
50
![]()
0:50
|
5 | |||
![]()
Cualquier nivel 25+ Mascota
|
![]()
2 x Pequeño ayudante podrido is always 6 rounds
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 1 ![]() |
40
![]()
0:40
|
6+ | |
Script No Obtenible |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 3 ![]() |
39
![]()
0:39
|
5 | |||
Script |
2 | 0.0 ![]() |
100% | 2 ![]() |
46
![]()
0:46
|
5 | |||
![]()
#1 above 1357HP preferred (Won't die to crit);
#2 having high power, ensures 5 rounds; #3 pet will likely not be needed. |
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 6 ![]() |
38
![]()
0:38
|
5+ | ||
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 0 ![]() |
42
![]()
0:42
|
6 | |||
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 1 ![]() |
50
![]()
0:50
|
6-7 | |||
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 1 ![]() |
46
![]()
0:46
|
5 | |||
Tienda Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 0 ![]() |
39
![]()
0:39
|
5 | |||
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 0 ![]() |
41
![]()
0:41
|
5 | |||
![]()
Cualquier Elemental
![]()
Cualquier Elemental
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
99% | 3 ![]() |
45
![]()
0:45
|
9-10 | ||
![]()
Cualquier nivel 25+ Mascota
|
![]()
I wanted to provide a strategy that used only Khaz Algar wild pets, so it should be pretty accessible even for new battlers!
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
98% | 1 ![]() |
99
![]()
1:39
|
13-14 | |
![]()
Cualquier nivel 25+ Mascota
|
Script |
2 | 0.0 ![]() |
100% | 0 ![]() |
44
![]()
0:44
|
6 | ||
Script |
2 | 0.0 ![]() |
100% | 0 ![]() |
70
![]()
1:10
|
12 | |||
Raza Script |
2 | 0.0 ![]() |
100% | 0 ![]() |
46
![]()
0:46
|
5 | |||
Script |
2 | 0.0 ![]() |
100% | 0 ![]() |
46
![]()
0:46
|
6 | |||
![]()
Best to use the "script" since the enemy’s attack can vary for each fight.
Here is a link to an example battle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gkr40qQEfqU |
Raza Script |
2 | 0.0 ![]() |
96% | 0 ![]() |
92
![]()
1:32
|
14+ | ||
No Obtenible |
2 | 0.0 ![]() |
N/A | 0 ![]() |
80
![]()
1:20
|
14 | |||
![]()
Cualquier mascota
![]()
Cualquier mascota
|
RNG |
2 | 0.0 ![]() |
N/A | 0 ![]() |
86
![]()
1:26
|
17-19 | ||
![]()
Cualquier mascota
![]()
Cualquier mascota
|
![]()
~70% winrate:
The ennemy pet has 50% chance to succeed his spell 1. The fight is lost if he succeeds the two uses of this spell. So you have 75% chance to not be in this case. This ennemy pet has also ~5% chance to succeed to hit two times all of his other spell and get crits with it, and in this case, 1 success for his 1st spell may be enough to kill you. Note that your volcan has 25% chance to stun, but it does not interfer at all in the result of the fight. |
RNG |
2 | 0.0 ![]() |
N/A | 0 ![]() |
60
![]()
1:00
|
6-7 |
Incl. pasos:
Cualquier nivel 1+ Mascota
I was able to take a level 1 battle pet to level 6 (45% into level 6) with the Safari Hat (only)
Tried with a second battle pet, with hat and both treats, raised its level to 7 (1610xp). This might be a viable option during the Pet Battle bonus weeks for power-leveling pets. Will investigate the xp gain, during the next PBBW.
Also further information regarding power leveling from Arji:
XP with Sign of the Critter, Hat and WQ up: My leveling pet got 2268XP
- Repeating the fight after the WQ was already complete a level 1 pet got 1827 XP (8 Levels)
edit - script added. Thank you DragonAfterDark
Edit - Based on Feedback below script has been changed, and strategy updated.
Astihueso | BB |
Ikky | PS |
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Major! *salutes*
2
Arji
escrito el 2025-04-28 09:24:13
- Repeating the fight after the WQ was already complete a level 1 pet got 1827 XP (8 Levels) (editado)
2
TheGrandmaGamer
escrito el 2025-04-11 14:39:04
First, just a correction.
Blistering cold has a 2 round cooldown, so the Turns are not really accurate under strategy. It should be Blistering Cold followed by 2 rounds of Chop. Repeat.
Bonestorm! does such a small amoung of damage (sorry didn't write it down; like 50 points more than Chop?) that it does not seem worth it to lose that much health for one small attack. His RNG makes him miss so often I think it is better to conserve health with the hope of inflicting additional Blistering colds. My Bonestorm had 15 health for 3 rounds before an attack finally landed to kill him. But that allowed him to add one more Blistering Cold.
Also, when I died the first time and knew Blistering Cold was on its 2 round cool down, with only the one round left, I'd rather use the higher damage move with the high chance of missing. It's my last move anyway. Freaked me out when it actually landed.
I did not use a small level pet. Doesn't one training stone add 2000 XP? I use fights like this when I have a pet partially into a level, particularly level 24. I hate wasting a stone on a pet that needs less than that 2000 XP to level up. I am certainly glad I did, He killed my Ikky and gained some health. Gratefully, it was nothing my level 24 Beetle couldn't handle and won the fight for the XP.
Especially when the fight is for battle stones, I'd just as soon get done and move on the the next World Quest.
(editado)
3
PoppaMike55#1495
escrito el 2025-03-20 15:00:26
Turn 1 - Chop
Turn 2 - Blistering Cold
Turn 3 - switch to Ikky
Turn 4 - Black Claw
Turn 5 - Flock, and you're now done
1
Kiriia#1293
escrito el 2025-03-10 16:12:21
3
Morti
escrito el 2025-03-04 01:59:08
1
Mode42#1160
escrito el 2025-01-23 09:01:29
On average this finished on turn seven and as early as turn six roughly 6% of the time.
change(#2) [self(#3).active]
use(BONESTORM!!:1762)
use(Blistering Cold:786)
use(Chop:943)
use(Black Claw:919) [!enemy.aura(Black Claw:918).exists]
use(Flock:581)
standby
change(#3)
2
mraymus
escrito el 2024-10-13 19:23:25
1
(OP) Halyanth#1611
escrito el 2024-12-09 18:05:24
5
Kroan#2404
escrito el 2024-09-18 14:05:15
1
(OP) Halyanth#1611
escrito el 2024-12-09 18:05:10
4
DragonsAfterDark
escrito el 2024-09-06 07:12:17
change(#2) [self(#3).active]
use(Blistering Cold:786)
use(Chop:943) [!enemy.aura(Bleeding:491).exists]
use(BONESTORM!!:1762)
use(Chop:943)
use(Black Claw:919) [!enemy.aura(Black Claw:918).exists]
use(Flock:581)
standby
change(#3)
1
(OP) Halyanth#1611
escrito el 2024-09-07 23:03:12
1
DragonsAfterDark
escrito el 2024-09-08 06:06:54
1
Stupflip#2627
escrito el 2025-03-10 00:39:38
Nuevo comentario: