Humanoid Havoc | Draconic Destruction | Fierce Fliers | Unstoppable Undead | Critical Critters |
Magical Mayhem | Elemental Escalation | ![]() | Aquatic Assault | Mechanical Melee |
Strategy added by Eekwibble
1
1
Average rating: |
4.3 |
Ratings: |
6 |
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Tags
Filter strategies:
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
![]()
I was only able to test PP/SS for the Zandalari Anklerender and got both to work fine as long as they got 2 hits of Hunting Party off, therefore I think any of the breeds should work, you just might have to restart a couple times if it dies too early.
Edit: Shadowlands beta tested |
RNG |
2 | 4.7 ![]() |
N/A | 68 ![]() |
65
![]()
1:05
|
8-11 | ||
RNG |
2 | 4.6 ![]() |
N/A | 13 ![]() |
55
![]()
0:55
|
7 | |||
![]()
Note Health and Speed restrictions.
|
Breed Script |
2 | 4.1 ![]() |
N/A | 7 ![]() |
36
![]()
0:36
|
5 | ||
![]()
The sim tool has not been mapped for this battle yet, and that allows for Shadeflicker to open with any ability rather than the clearly scripted use of Void Gate, so using it to parse success rate reliably for this strategy is not possible. I am fairly certain this strat cannot fail.
|
Breed Script |
2 | 4.3 ![]() |
N/A | 1 ![]() |
51
![]()
0:51
|
6-7 | ||
![]()
This one was satisfying to make ^^
|
Breed Script |
2 | 4.0 ![]() |
N/A | 3 ![]() |
43
![]()
0:43
|
6 | ||
Breed RNG |
2 | 3.3 ![]() |
N/A | 2 ![]() |
60
![]()
1:00
|
7-8 | |||
Breed |
2 | 3.7 ![]() |
N/A | 0 ![]() |
50
![]()
0:50
|
7+ |
Incl. steps:
Skills: 2 * *
Breed: SS
Breed | Health | Power | Speed |
---|---|---|---|
SS | 1237 | 276 | 341 |
PP | 1237 | 341 | 276 |
PS | 1237 | 305 | 305 |
PB | 1302 | 305 | 289 |
![]() <1238 | ![]() >340 |
Skills: 2 * *
Breed: SS
Breed | Health | Power | Speed |
---|---|---|---|
SS | 1237 | 276 | 341 |
PP | 1237 | 341 | 276 |
PS | 1237 | 305 | 305 |
PB | 1302 | 305 | 289 |
![]() <1238 | ![]() >340 |
Skills: 2 * *
Breed: SS
Breed | Health | Power | Speed |
---|---|---|---|
SS | 1237 | 276 | 341 |
PP | 1237 | 341 | 276 |
PS | 1237 | 305 | 305 |
PB | 1302 | 305 | 289 |
![]() <1238 | ![]() >340 |
Substitutes:
1 / 2
1 / 3
The sim tool has not been mapped for this battle yet, and that allows for Shadeflicker to open with any ability rather than the clearly scripted use of Void Gate, so using it to parse success rate reliably for this strategy is not possible. I am fairly certain this strat cannot fail.
Before | After | Experience Gain | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ➜ | 5 | 479 |
2 | ➜ | 5 | 508 |
3 | ➜ | 5 | 535 |
4 | ➜ | 6 | 558 |
5 | ➜ | 6 | 578 |
6 | ➜ | 7 | 594 |
7 | ➜ | 8 | 607 |
8 | ➜ | 9 | 617 |
9 | ➜ | 9 | 624 |
10 | ➜ | 10 | 627 |
11 | ➜ | 11 | 627 |
12 | ➜ | 12 | 624 |
13 | ➜ | 13 | 617 |
14 | ➜ | 14 | 607 |
15 | ➜ | 15 | 594 |
16 | ➜ | 16 | 578 |
17 | ➜ | 17 | 558 |
18 | ➜ | 18 | 535 |
19 | ➜ | 19 | 508 |
20 | ➜ | 20 | 479 |
21 | ➜ | 21 | 446 |
22 | ➜ | 22 | 409 |
23 | ➜ | 23 | 370 |
24 | ➜ | 24 | 327 |
Safari Hat |
|
Lesser Pet Treat |
|
Pet Treat |
|
Darkmoon Hat |
|
Pet Battle Week |
= |
Pet levels to 25 with minimal XP lost |
|
= |
Additional XP above level 25 is lost |
|
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Tiny little scratches...
1
Kawaii#11512
wrote on 2025-06-04 00:40:46
2
WhyDaRumGone
wrote on 2024-11-21 08:59:24
You'll also notice in the Sim section on here shows N/A.
What this means; even though the Sim is available to see health stats etc, it can't be used for strategy creation.
Please note that this strategy is essentially the same as this one but with hunting party, so shouldn't be any issues.
Edit: I see you've mention about the beast section? Did you want to transfer it there or will you make a copy in that section?
(edited)
2
(OP) Eekwibble
wrote on 2024-11-22 12:25:33
I'll copy this over to the Beast section, no worries.
Thanks again for taking the time to explain. I shall edit the info tab accordingly.
2
Aranesh
wrote on 2024-12-03 10:17:06
New Comment: