Strategy added by RonaldP
Average rating: |
0 |
Ratings: |
0 |
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Tags
Filter strategies:
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
![]()
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
![]()
Health Breeds recommended.
|
Level 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 61 ![]() |
55
![]()
0:55
|
5-6 | |
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 17 ![]() |
60
![]()
1:00
|
7 | |||
![]()
Any Pet
|
Script |
2 | 4.9 ![]() |
100% | 74 ![]() |
72
![]()
1:12
|
6 | ||
Script Unobtainable |
2 | 4.9 ![]() |
100% | 53 ![]() |
34
![]()
0:34
|
4 | |||
![]()
Any Pet
|
Script |
2 | 4.9 ![]() |
99% | 7 ![]() |
48
![]()
0:48
|
5 | ||
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 3 ![]() |
37
![]()
0:37
|
4 | |||
![]()
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Level 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 3 ![]() |
50
![]()
0:50
|
5 | ||
![]()
Note you can't select both Fraction exploders at the same time and must use alternative from the selections
|
Breed Script Unobtainable |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 0 ![]() |
36
![]()
0:36
|
4 | ||
![]()
Any Pet
|
![]()
Hungry Burrower often solos
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 0 ![]() |
56
![]()
0:56
|
7+ | |
![]()
Any Pet
|
![]()
Updated to remove level pet.
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 1 ![]() |
83
![]()
1:23
|
13+ | |
![]()
3rd pet MUST be above 319 speed
|
Breed Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 1 ![]() |
47
![]()
0:47
|
6 | ||
![]()
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
![]()
Saw DragonsAfterDark`s strategy and tried it wit a lvlpet. Worked like a charm.
|
RNG Level 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
95% | 2 ![]() |
73
![]()
1:13
|
7 | |
![]()
Any Pet
|
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
N/A | 2 ![]() |
61
![]()
1:01
|
9+ | |||
Unobtainable |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
N/A | 0 ![]() |
67
![]()
1:07
|
11 | |||
Script |
2 | 0.0 ![]() |
100% | 0 ![]() |
55
![]()
0:55
|
5 | |||
![]()
Best to use the "script" since the enemy’s attack can vary for each fight.
Here is a link to an example battle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goQBoRnokEA |
Script |
2 | 0.0 ![]() |
100% | 0 ![]() |
79
![]()
1:19
|
9+ | ||
![]()
a bit slow, just loved the simplicity of it. ;-)
|
Script |
2 | 0.0 ![]() |
100% | 0 ![]() |
100
![]()
1:40
|
14+ | ||
![]()
Any Pet
|
Script |
2 | 0.0 ![]() |
99% | 0 ![]() |
70
![]()
1:10
|
7 |
Incl. steps:
Substitutes:
1 / 3
1 / 3
1 / 2
Best to use the "script" since the enemy’s attack can vary for each fight.
Here is a link to an example battle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goQBoRnokEA
Brilliant Glimmershell | HP |
Chuck | BB |
Hydraling | PB |
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Speaking of wild growth...
1
(OP) RonaldP
wrote on 2024-09-28 16:50:45
1
DragonsAfterDark
wrote on 2024-09-29 03:19:11
A couple suggestions:
1. Use Surge instead of Rip after Blood in the Water, since it'll do strong damage.
2. You don't need to slot Tail Slap at all. Swallow You Whole is basically just a static damage Aquatic attack that does more damage when an enemy is < 25% hp. It doesn't have a CD that would necessitate the use of Tail Slap.
Also, you don't actually have a script attached to this strategy ^^'
use(Pinch:2067) [round>4 & self(#1).active]
use(Pump:297) [self(#1).active]
use(Rip:803) [self.round=1 & self(#2).active]
use(Blood in the Water:423) [enemy.aura(Bleeding:491).exists]
use(Surge:509) [self(#2).active]
use(Swallow You Whole:276)
change(next)
2
(OP) RonaldP
wrote on 2024-09-29 16:27:08
1
DragonsAfterDark
wrote on 2024-09-29 21:28:46
New Comment: