Strategy added by Mode42#1160
5
5
|
Average rating: |
5 |
|
Ratings: |
8 |
|
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters.
|
 |
|||||||
|
~1% RNG
3rd pet might not be needed. Also likely can be any order; I've actually soloed it with King in slot 1 |
Script |
2 | 4.9  |
100% | 13  |
77
1:17
|
12+ | |
|
It's hard to say this strategy is RNG-free when the opponent pets use random moves, but in my testing it's been consistently able to win even when Ridge uses Quake multiple times early on. Sometimes Ridge just uses Stoneskin six turns in a row and you get to take down the backline pets for free, but sometimes you can't even get a second Great Sting.
Generally, the strategy is to weaken the backline pets as much as you can with Infernal Pyreclaw's Great Sting/Cleave and Direhorn Runt's Primal Cry, then take down Ridge with Trample and let your King Viperid clean up. Direhorn Runt can probably be swapped with anything that can reliably win the 1v1 against Ridge, but I found Primal Cry to be helpful for the extra bit of backline damage with this strategy. All three pets are relatively easy to cage and I'm pretty sure the breeds don't matter, but for what it's worth my Infernal Pyreclaw is PB and my Direhorn Runt is HP. |
2 | 4.6 |
N/A | 33 |
100
1:40
|
13+ | ||
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 |
100% | 3 |
63
1:03
|
9+ | ||
|
~1% chance this fails
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 |
100% | 3 |
75
1:15
|
11+ | |
|
Technically 99% win rate but only if you get really bad RNG.
3rd slot is pretty flexible, chose gizmo for the speed and 1 big hit in Arcane Dash if the RNG requires it. FYI - First enemy pet has 297 speed but the other two only have 276. |
Script Unobtainable |
2 | 5.0 |
100% | 5 |
75
1:15
|
10+ | |
|
I tried 4 times, won 4 times, simulator says it can fail tho, maybe about crits or misses.
I tried this strat because I had no rotbreath pet for the other |
RNG Script |
2 | 4.2 |
87% | 38 |
97
1:37
|
14+ | |
|
|
Script |
2 | 4.8 |
100% | 4 |
73
1:13
|
10+ | ||
|
RNG Script |
2 | 3.9 |
84% | 4 |
100
1:40
|
11+ | ||
|
Breed RNG |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 0 |
101
1:41
|
14-15 | ||
|
Script |
2 | 3.6 |
93% | 6 |
93
1:33
|
12+ | ||
Any Level 25+ Beast
|
Script by DragonsAfertDark
|
RNG Script |
2 | 4.0 |
82% | 0 |
87
1:27
|
10+ | |
|
|
RNG |
2 | 3.3 |
N/A | 1 |
75
1:15
|
10+ | ||
|
|
Breed Script |
2 | 0.0 |
98% | 0 |
97
1:37
|
11+ | ||
|
|
~82% WR across 1000 battles. RNG-dependent. Crits can completely mess up the strategy. I had none of the other strategies' pets apart from the Calf, so this is how I did it, but I would recommend other strats if you have the pets.
|
Breed RNG Script |
2 | 0.0 |
77% | 0 |
85
1:25
|
9+ |
Incl. steps:
Technically 99% win rate but only if you get really bad RNG.
3rd slot is pretty flexible, chose gizmo for the speed and 1 big hit in Arcane Dash if the RNG requires it.
FYI - First enemy pet has 297 speed but the other two only have 276.
1 Min 15 Sec
10+ | Infernal Pyreclaw | PB |
| Jingles | SS |
| Gizmo | PS |
2025-01-21 22:57:24
2025-01-21 22:35:37
6,756
Unknown
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Pretty ancient. Speaking in geological terms
1
Kakapo
wrote on 2025-03-17 22:48:25
1
Cancuna#1391
wrote on 2025-01-23 19:24:42
New Comment: