Strategie eingefügt von Elfyr
38
38
|
Durchschnittliche Bewertung: |
4.6 |
|
Bewertungen |
91 |
|
Deine Bewertung: |
|
Creator |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
 |
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters.
|
 |
|||||||
| 1 | 
|
Script |
2 | 4.9  |
35  |
190
3:10
|
27+ |  |
||
| 2 | 
|
I've tried this 4 times and have won each time. I know this fight has a lot of RNG with the ability order so, there may be cases where this doesn't work. However, each of the 4 attempts I did have resulted in a pretty clean win, with the 3rd Anomalus having atleast 600 HP at the end.
Let me know if you run into any cases where this fails, thank you! |
Script |
2 | 4.8 |
13 |
112
1:52
|
14+ | |
|
| 3 |
Stufe 25+ Magisch
|
The idea of this battle is to kill the backline pets and finish off Lifft with any pet.
I used Netherspawn, Spawn of Netherspawn - but Lifft is usually so low any pet will do. Has worked 5/5 times. |
2 | 4.6 |
38 |
138
2:18
|
20+ | |
||
| 4 | 
|
This is based on the original 10.1 PTR tamer pets' stats/quality/etc. It might need adjustments on last-minute changes (potential nerfs).
**Normally we would pass turns with a faster pet when the enemy pet is Underwater, but Netherschlag will even buff up when it misses, so I start passing turns when it is maxed. *** Swole will use Headbutt and Dive on cooldown, with Headbutt being the highest priority. |
Script |
2 | 4.8 |
4 |
117
1:57
|
18+ | |
|
| 5 | 
|
All spiky dude strat!
Fürst Blattington can solo enemies 1 and 3, so it's mostly just getting other pets to take out the second guy. I realized while working on a leveling strat with his lordship that I had two magic pets at one point, so might as well add a third, and then, well, might as well make them all spiky! (I also have a version with Jiggles and Baa'l that works similarly) The significance of the second pet is Segen der Erhabenen for pet #3 when they come in, giving them a chance to kill off (or nearly kill off) the second enemy. |
Script |
2 | 4.2 |
2 |
260
4:20
|
37+ | |
|
| 6 | 
|
|
Zufall |
2 | 3.7 |
4 |
115
1:55
|
17 | |
|
| 7 | 
|
takes forever
|
Script |
2 | 0.0 |
0 |
220
3:40
|
37+ | |
Notizen:
Stufe 25+ Magisch
Sprüche: alle
Breed: alle
Ersatz:
1 / 2
The idea of this battle is to kill the backline pets and finish off Lifft with any pet.
I used Netherspawn, Spawn of Netherspawn - but Lifft is usually so low any pet will do.
Has worked 5/5 times.
2 Min 18 Sec
20+ 
2023-05-13 23:15:46
2023-05-08 10:09:50
19,583
Für die beste Darstellung deiner Strategie befolge bitte diese Richtlinien:
Leerennova When Lifft isn't underwater.Für die beste Darstellung deiner Strategie befolge bitte diese Richtlinien:
Giftprotokoll when Lifft isn't underwaterFür die beste Darstellung deiner Strategie befolge bitte diese Richtlinien:
Schleimberührung as fillerFür die beste Darstellung deiner Strategie befolge bitte diese Richtlinien:
Für die beste Darstellung deiner Strategie befolge bitte diese Richtlinien:
Für die beste Darstellung deiner Strategie befolge bitte diese Richtlinien:
Magie verstärken - Especially when Lifft is underwaterFür die beste Darstellung deiner Strategie befolge bitte diese Richtlinien:
Für die beste Darstellung deiner Strategie befolge bitte diese Richtlinien:
Für die beste Darstellung deiner Strategie befolge bitte diese Richtlinien:
Für die beste Darstellung deiner Strategie befolge bitte diese Richtlinien:
Für die beste Darstellung deiner Strategie befolge bitte diese Richtlinien:
What an Up-Lift-ing fellow!
Arkaner Sturm
Arkane Explosion
9
Nefalien
schrieb am 2023-05-20 09:24:54
use(#2) [!enemy.aura(Unter Wasser:830).exists & self(#1).active]
use(#2) [self(#2).active]
use(#3) [!enemy.aura(Unter Wasser:830).exists & !self(#3).active]
use(#1)
change(next)
1
(OP) Elfyr
schrieb am 2023-07-14 18:13:21
1
Rysana
schrieb am 2023-11-26 00:46:51
From DragonsAfterDark strat: (We don't have the quill.)
"grixxis wrote on 5/10/2023
Used Trunks (2/1/1) as the third pet. Headbutt on cd, Ethereal to dodge dive (priority move), and fill with Smash"
3
KillerMoyashi13
schrieb am 2023-08-28 09:49:53
2
Tigrari
schrieb am 2023-09-19 06:18:32
3
Sunshine529
schrieb am 2023-07-19 12:53:54
if [!enemy.aura(Underwater:830).exists]
use(Void Nova:2356)
use(Poison Protocol:1954)
use(Arcane Storm:589)
endif
use(Amplify Magic:488) [enemy.aura(Underwater:830).exists]
use(#1)
change(next)
2
Gráinne
schrieb am 2023-05-10 12:19:20
For example, you require Anomalus to have over 1034 HP. But Anomalus, with its one breed, has exactly and only 1034 HP.
Defensive specification of requirements can be a good thing to do, in case later pets are added with the same moveset but different stats, but even when doing this, you should try to allow the pet you actually mean to be included.
If you require at least 1034 health, you should specify that as Health > 1033. Since you have specified health > 1034, the site can't locate any breed that matches, and so calls it "Uncertain", and shows me a yellow warning telling me I don't have a pet that matches the requirements.
There are cases where the site shows or elevates strats to specific people depending on whether they have a matching species/breed in their collection. Your strat will rule itself out by being impossible to match.
I would not think that you need to specify any restrictions on Anomalus at all, but if you do, make them possible to attain. (editiert)
5
DragonsAfterDark
schrieb am 2023-05-14 03:24:38
As to the strat itself, I would definitely recommend something with Beast attacks in slot 3. Lifft still had > 1k hp when the backline died, and the wrong pet there can result in a failure due to not being able to out damage the heal + Shell Armor.
A couple of the new pets this xpac, Kobaldt & Lord Basilton, have a nice speed stat, a beast attack, and Tranquility to mitigate Dive damage.
1
(OP) Elfyr
schrieb am 2023-07-14 18:15:53
2
monowai
schrieb am 2023-07-04 06:27:34
2
Aur
schrieb am 2023-07-02 19:26:14
2
BorisMorosov
schrieb am 2023-06-18 04:53:46
1
dawni
schrieb am 2023-05-27 17:08:39
2
Moonii#1265
schrieb am 2023-05-19 14:19:56
1
(OP) Elfyr
schrieb am 2023-05-17 19:55:07
0
Elaeana#1554
schrieb am 2023-05-15 23:24:10
1
BurntGinger#1399
schrieb am 2023-05-10 05:26:41
0
Prochea schrieb am 2023-05-09 21:28:28
Neuer Kommentar: