Humanoid Havoc | Draconic Destruction | Fierce Fliers | Unstoppable Undead | Critical Critters |
| Magical Mayhem | Elemental Escalation | Beast Blitz | Aquatic Assault | Mechanical Melee |
Strategy added by RogueRaccoon
3
3
|
Average rating: |
5 |
|
Ratings: |
6 |
|
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tags
Filter strategies:
|
|||||||||
This is somewhat based on the strategy posted by mlucinda (https://www.wowhead.com/npc=128015/gloamwing#comments:id=2521318). I used Globe Yeti, but Rotten Little Helper seems to be a popular choice for his Greench's Gift, which is similar to the yeti's Gift of Winter's Veil.
The added protection moves (Lovestruck and Bubble) allow a bit more survivability and hopefully reduces the RNG a bit. My pets are P/B, B/B, B/B |
Script |
2 | 4.8 |
60% | 20 |
85
1:25
|
11-12 | ||
3 check points for restarting due to crits:
* If your #1 pet is crit (round 1 or 8) and your #2 pet can't survive at least 1 Slicing wind (very small chance to win if it can survive). * If your #3 pet dies round 6 (using a pet above ~1540 will prevent max stacks killing). Ran 20 times, never had a failure but theoretically there should have been at least 1 failure. |
Script |
2 | 4.7 |
90% | 16 |
56
0:56
|
8 | ||
Main strategy credit goes to DragonsAfterDark. Just changed one pet to cut the RNG.
TD Script by NabuArat |
Script |
2 | 4.7 |
59% | 30 |
78
1:18
|
11 | ||
Note that because of slicing wing, this fight is pretty RNG with any team.
You may have to restart many times. It took me around 6 with this team. I don't know if breed matter. I used Winter's Little Helper BB Kun-Lai Runt PP and Rotten Little Helper PP Script thanks to wist |
Script |
2 | 4.0 |
35% | 40 |
76
1:16
|
11 | ||
| 2 | 3.8 |
N/A | 5 |
74
1:14
|
10-11 | ||||
In Shadowlands, the breed restriction allows for 2 normal Slicing Wind hits on your Slimy Darkhunter once Gloamwing uses Predatory Strike. I believe the other 2 breeds would only allow for 1.
|
Breed Script |
2 | 5.0 |
67% | 1 |
65
1:05
|
9 | ||
Found this stragegy on wowhead and I thought I'd share it here.
By: Roeevv - https://www.wowhead.com/npc=128015/gloamwing#comments:id=2528217 Grumpling needs to have more hp than harbringer |
Script |
2 | 5.0 |
57% | 3 |
69
1:09
|
10 | ||
Script |
2 | 0.0 |
93% | 0 |
59
0:59
|
8-9 |
Incl. steps:






Substitutes:
1 / 2
Found this stragegy on wowhead and I thought I'd share it here.
By: Roeevv - https://www.wowhead.com/npc=128015/gloamwing#comments:id=2528217
Grumpling needs to have more hp than harbringer
| Before | After | Experience Gain | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ➜ | 5 | 479 |
| 2 | ➜ | 5 | 508 |
| 3 | ➜ | 5 | 535 |
| 4 | ➜ | 6 | 558 |
| 5 | ➜ | 6 | 578 |
| 6 | ➜ | 7 | 594 |
| 7 | ➜ | 8 | 607 |
| 8 | ➜ | 9 | 617 |
| 9 | ➜ | 9 | 624 |
| 10 | ➜ | 10 | 627 |
| 11 | ➜ | 11 | 627 |
| 12 | ➜ | 12 | 624 |
| 13 | ➜ | 13 | 617 |
| 14 | ➜ | 14 | 607 |
| 15 | ➜ | 15 | 594 |
| 16 | ➜ | 16 | 578 |
| 17 | ➜ | 17 | 558 |
| 18 | ➜ | 18 | 535 |
| 19 | ➜ | 19 | 508 |
| 20 | ➜ | 20 | 479 |
| 21 | ➜ | 21 | 446 |
| 22 | ➜ | 22 | 409 |
| 23 | ➜ | 23 | 370 |
| 24 | ➜ | 24 | 327 |
|
Safari Hat |
|
|
Lesser Pet Treat |
|
|
Pet Treat |
|
|
Darkmoon Hat |
|
|
Pet Battle Week |
|
= |
Pet levels to 25 with minimal XP lost |
|
|
= |
Additional XP above level 25 is lost |
|
| Squirky | BB |
| Grumpling | PP |
| Harbinger of Flame | PP |
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Still a better love story than twilight.

1
Lochru#1292
wrote on 2023-04-23 06:30:49
New Comment: