Strategia aggiunta da Jagûar
Average rating: |
3.3 |
Ratings: |
6 |
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters. |
||||||||||
1 |
Ghastly Kid and Naxxy will likely solo this battle. Voodoo Figurine is a good back up but any standard attack from an Undead pet should do it. If Dead Deckhand Leonard sweeps before the undead round, either change back to Ghastly Kid or restart the battle.
Script thanks to Hamadryad |
Script |
2 | 5.0 | 21 | 150
2:30
|
17+ | |||
2 |
Qualsiasi Livello 25+ Non Morta
|
2 | 4.9 | 12 | 112
1:52
|
15+ | ||||
3 |
Qualsiasi Livello 25+ Non Morta
|
Reworked with a more accessible pet than the Bloodbrood Whelpling
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 | 5 | 120
2:00
|
15+ | ||
4 |
Two whelps are recommended due to RNG with fragment's soul rush stun and leonard's use of sweep.
|
2 | 5.0 | 0 | 145
2:25
|
19+ | ||||
5 |
This for people who don't have naxxy and want an easy way out :D enjoy this was also found by Moxxi but never made it into a team
The TD script was made by dreamgarden |
Script |
2 | 5.0 | 2 | 135
2:15
|
16+ | |||
6 | 2 | 3.0 | 1 | 170
2:50
|
22+ | |||||
7 | Tipo Script |
2 | 3.3 | 0 | 165
2:45
|
23+ |
Includi Passaggi:
Prima | Dopo | Esperienza Guadagnata | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ➜ | 3 | 239 |
2 | ➜ | 4 | 254 |
3 | ➜ | 4 | 267 |
4 | ➜ | 5 | 279 |
5 | ➜ | 6 | 289 |
6 | ➜ | 6 | 297 |
7 | ➜ | 7 | 304 |
8 | ➜ | 8 | 309 |
9 | ➜ | 9 | 312 |
10 | ➜ | 10 | 314 |
11 | ➜ | 11 | 314 |
12 | ➜ | 12 | 312 |
13 | ➜ | 13 | 309 |
14 | ➜ | 14 | 304 |
15 | ➜ | 15 | 297 |
16 | ➜ | 16 | 289 |
17 | ➜ | 17 | 279 |
18 | ➜ | 18 | 267 |
19 | ➜ | 19 | 254 |
20 | ➜ | 20 | 239 |
21 | ➜ | 21 | 223 |
22 | ➜ | 22 | 205 |
23 | ➜ | 23 | 185 |
24 | ➜ | 24 | 163 |
Cappello da Safari |
|
Integratore Inferiore |
|
Integratore |
|
Cilindro di Lunacupa |
|
Evento bonus: scontri tra mascotte |
= |
Le mascotte livellano fino al 25 con minima XP persa |
|
= |
XP aggiuntiva oltre il livello 25 è persa. |
|
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Yes! Yes, they are! Especially those three...
1
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.Mayzen
scritto il 2021-09-28 16:55:33
1
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.PureFaith#1442
scritto il 2018-12-23 16:37:22
1
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.Nemy
scritto il 2021-06-18 23:31:38
-3
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.Walocial
scritto il 2019-05-11 12:15:10
2
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.Gráinne
scritto il 2019-05-11 13:29:41
It really bugs me when people do this.
Sure, it's possible that strats can be wrong, and certainly when it comes to challenge achievements like Family most strats will not be 100%. That's fine. Let's by all means identify what went wrong.
But to do that we need people to give details so that others can a) conform that there is a problem and b) analyse where in the strat a change could be made to fix it.
And, honestly, I find a lot of complaints made about strats come from people who didn't follow them correctly.
Jagûar is an experienced strat-setter, so I'm guessing that in this case the problem is at your end. If you want anyone to believe otherwise:
1. Specify the pets and breeds you used
2. Explain exactly where the battle first deviated from the strat
3. Ideally, post a log of your attempt.
2
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.Honeywhiss
scritto il 2021-03-13 23:40:06
1
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.voodoomon
scritto il 2020-05-25 23:01:44
1
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.DTJames
scritto il 2019-05-16 18:00:09
1
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.Elaeana#1554
scritto il 2019-07-09 16:11:41
1
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.haneyjs
scritto il 2019-01-18 08:48:06
0
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.Tiggles
scritto il 2019-01-11 06:53:59
if [self(#1).active]
ability(#2) [enemy(#1).active]
ability(#3) [enemy(#1).active]
standby [self.aura(174).exists]
ability(#1) [enemy(#1).active]
ability(#2) [enemy(#2).active]
ability(#3) [enemy(#2).active]
ability(#1) [enemy(#2).active]
change(#3) [self(#1).dead]
endif
if [self(#2).active]
ability(#3) [enemy(#1).active]
ability(#1) [enemy(#1).active]
change(#1) [self.dead & enemy(#1).active]
endif
if [self(#3).active]
ability(#3) [enemy(#1).active & !enemy.aura(658).exists]
ability(#2) [enemy(#1).active & !enemy.aura(213).exists]
ability(#3) [enemy(#2).active & !enemy.aura(658).exists]
ability(#2) [enemy(#2).active & !enemy.aura(213).exists]
ability(#3) [enemy(#1).active & !enemy.aura(658).exists]
ability(#2) [enemy(#1).active & !enemy.aura(658).exists]
change(#1) [enemy.aura(242).exists]
ability(#1)
endif
change(next) [self.dead]
Note: I've done my best to account for the Sweep bringing in either Blightbreath or Scourged Whelpling. I used 23 Bandages and Dead Deckhand Leonard still refused to bring in Scourged Whelpling.
7
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.Firecrest
scritto il 2018-12-14 23:37:27
My suggestion is:
Start with Frostwolf Ghostpup
1: Refuge
2+: Scratch until Frostwolf Ghostpup dies (you kill Dread Deckhand Leonard and 1/3ish of Corrupted Slime)
3: Ghostly Bite (during Frostwolf's undead round)
Bring in Scourged Whelpling
1+: Tail Sweep until you win. Bring in 3rd pet if necessary to clean up. Scourged Whelpling survived until the end on all my attempts.
2
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.canofbutter
scritto il 2018-12-20 14:24:42
0
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.Anne scritto il 2018-12-15 12:39:18
0
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.Truweil scritto il 2018-12-15 00:03:26
1
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.siggy
scritto il 2018-12-15 00:00:41
4
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.siggy
scritto il 2018-12-14 23:58:43
-2
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.Truweil scritto il 2018-12-14 23:57:40
Nuovo Commento: