Estrategia añadida por Cacobeitor
4
4
Puntuación media: |
4.1 |
Puntuaciones: |
33 |
Tu voto: |
|
Creator |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Etiquetas
Filtrar estrategias:
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
RNG Script |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 51 ![]() |
120
![]()
2:00
|
16+ | |||
RNG Script |
2 | 4.9 ![]() |
100% | 35 ![]() |
116
![]()
1:56
|
14+ | |||
RNG |
2 | 4.1 ![]() |
N/A | 4 ![]() |
94
![]()
1:34
|
10 | |||
![]()
It was a toss-up between using Wind-up and Clean-up with the Enchaned Broom
Script thanks to Schlumpf |
RNG Complicada Script |
2 | 3.6 ![]() |
46% | 4 ![]() |
137
![]()
2:17
|
17+ |
Incl. pasos:
Habilidades: * * 2
Raza: Cualquier
Raza | Salud | Poder | Velocidad |
---|---|---|---|
BB | 1522 | 276 | 268 |
HH | 1766 | 260 | 252 |
HP | 1587 | 289 | 252 |
HS | 1587 | 260 | 281 |
Habilidades: * * 2
Raza: Cualquier
Raza | Salud | Poder | Velocidad |
---|---|---|---|
PP | 1197 | 366 | 260 |
Habilidades: * * 1
Raza: Cualquier
Raza | Salud | Poder | Velocidad |
---|---|---|---|
BB | 1481 | 276 | 276 |
Habilidades: * * 2
Raza: Cualquier
Raza | Salud | Poder | Velocidad |
---|---|---|---|
PS | 1339 | 301 | 289 |
Habilidades: * * 2
Raza: Cualquier
Raza | Salud | Poder | Velocidad |
---|---|---|---|
BB | 1420 | 288 | 276 |
SS | 1339 | 272 | 325 |
HH | 1664 | 272 | 260 |
HP | 1485 | 301 | 260 |
PS | 1339 | 301 | 289 |
PB | 1404 | 301 | 273 |
SB | 1404 | 285 | 289 |
Habilidades: * * 2
Raza: Cualquier
Raza | Salud | Poder | Velocidad |
---|---|---|---|
HS | 1627 | 260 | 273 |
Sustitutos:
1 / 7
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
When one is in Zaralek Cavern, one should delve deeply into its treasures.
1
JezieNeeChan#1289
escrito el 2023-11-05 15:26:57
1
Gráinne
escrito el 2023-11-05 16:58:54
As I read the strat, you apply CoD to the opposing pet, and then swap it out to die on the backline later from the CoD.
1
Morti
escrito el 2024-04-18 01:59:23
2
Gráinne
escrito el 2024-04-18 03:31:15
I just tried it for myself three times, and here are my results:
1. won exactly as this strat expects, line for line. (with a H/P Voidwiggler)
2. lost when Swoggy got two crits on my Anomalus before its second Void Nova (with a H/P Voidwiggler)
3. won exactly per the strat except needed an extra Shadow Shock to win at the end (with a B/B Voidwiggler)
I didn't do the arithmetic, but that speed tie at the start introduces another element of random, and it definitely is possible for Anom to die early.
However, AFAICS, the CoD works exactly as expected.
1
Morti
escrito el 2024-05-11 16:30:52
If you use Shadowflame on Swoggy, then CoD and Nether Gate, you get closer to winning but the CoD doesn't kill Tempe and the Soul Rush doesn't kill Dustie. It's all contingent on that second Void Nova, near as I can tell.
1
Morti
escrito el 2024-04-18 02:03:38
2
elemenn7al
escrito el 2024-03-23 09:05:52
2
ShinRyuuken
escrito el 2024-01-15 07:16:31
Seems imperative that you get both Void Novas off.
3
Tigrari
escrito el 2023-11-07 04:26:08
1
MERMEL#1857
escrito el 2023-08-06 02:53:25
1
(OP) Cacobeitor
escrito el 2023-08-07 08:43:53
2
notebelow#2975
escrito el 2023-07-16 11:48:33
use(Soulrush:752)
use(#2)
use(#3)
use(#1)
quit [self(#1).dead & !enemy(#1).dead]
change(next)
Nuevo comentario: