Strategy added by Phil
6
6
Average rating: |
5 |
Ratings: |
1 |
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters. |
|||||||||
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
|
The three Pests can be defeated by many combinations of pets. Listed here are only a few good options, but there are many other good choices.
Script thanks to Koru |
Script |
2 | 4.6 | N/A | 8 | 26
0:26
|
3 |
Any Level 1+ Pet
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Script thanks to Moonie
|
Breed Level 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 | N/A | 6 | 26
0:26
|
3 | |
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 | N/A | 4 | 17
0:17
|
2 | ||
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
|
The three Pests can be defeated by many combinations of pets. Listed here are only a few good options, but there are many other good choices.
|
2 | 5.0 | N/A | 0 | 26
0:26
|
3-4 | |
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
2 | 5.0 | N/A | 0 | 17
0:17
|
2 | |||
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
Created from a comment by skarpethinn on another strat. The script works on Carrotus, Gnawface, and Gorefu. Can sometimes miss on Gnawface because of darkness, but thankfully Lio the Lioness is nearby if you need to heal your pets.
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 | N/A | 1 | 18
0:18
|
2 | |
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
|
The three Pests can be defeated by many combinations of pets. Listed here are only a few good options, but there are many other good choices.
|
2 | 0.0 | N/A | 0 | 27
0:27
|
3+ |
Incl. steps:
Any Level 1+ Pet
Any Level 1+ Pet
Script thanks to Moonie
Before | After | Experience Gain | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ➜ | 5 | 479 |
2 | ➜ | 5 | 508 |
3 | ➜ | 5 | 535 |
4 | ➜ | 6 | 558 |
5 | ➜ | 6 | 578 |
6 | ➜ | 7 | 594 |
7 | ➜ | 8 | 607 |
8 | ➜ | 9 | 617 |
9 | ➜ | 9 | 624 |
10 | ➜ | 10 | 627 |
11 | ➜ | 11 | 627 |
12 | ➜ | 12 | 624 |
13 | ➜ | 13 | 617 |
14 | ➜ | 14 | 607 |
15 | ➜ | 15 | 594 |
16 | ➜ | 16 | 578 |
17 | ➜ | 17 | 558 |
18 | ➜ | 18 | 535 |
19 | ➜ | 19 | 508 |
20 | ➜ | 20 | 479 |
21 | ➜ | 21 | 446 |
22 | ➜ | 22 | 409 |
23 | ➜ | 23 | 370 |
24 | ➜ | 24 | 327 |
Safari Hat |
|
Lesser Pet Treat |
|
Pet Treat |
|
Darkmoon Hat |
|
Pet Battle Week |
= |
Pet levels to 25 with minimal XP lost |
|
= |
Additional XP above level 25 is lost |
|
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Almost a Xu-Fu - but with too much Gore for my taste!
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsLlithari
wrote on 2024-04-30 03:10:24
A 3 round win is still technically doable, but 4-5 rounds has much better success for leveling with this strat:
use(Explode:282) [enemy.hp.can_be_exploded]
use(Wind-Up:459) [round~1,3]
use(#2)
(edited)
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentstranquilsea
wrote on 2020-06-05 00:13:57
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsGráinne
wrote on 2020-06-05 00:27:05
1
You must be logged in to vote on comments(OP) Phil
wrote on 2020-06-08 17:33:14
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsGráinne
wrote on 2020-06-11 07:53:48
It's a very simple battle. Your Starlette is not going to die from damage, and there are no type advantages, so it's just simple arithmetic.
All Explodes will do at least 560 damage (more for higher health) and GoreFu has 1318, so 758 from the Wind-Up guarantees a win.
Wind-Up will do the stated damage +10% for the buff.
For P/P, that's 893.
For H/P, P/B and P/S, it's 804.
For H/H, it's 732. (But H/H Explode does 690, so H/H will work.
So I am now stumped to understand what breed won't work. tranquilsea, what breed were you running, and was it a Level 25 Blue?
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsVolchugg wrote on 2024-04-09 08:28:58
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsLilyoptra
wrote on 2020-09-27 19:27:30
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsLutz#1514
wrote on 2023-03-21 21:52:40
use(Wind-Up:459) [ round~1,3 ]
use(Storm Coil:1922)
use(Explode:282)
(edited)
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsMoonie
wrote on 2020-10-02 07:03:04
use(Wind-Up:459) [round~1,2]
use(Explode:282)
New Comment: