전략이 추가됨. 추가자: Unsaintly
54
54
Average rating: |
4.9 |
Ratings: |
96 |
귀하의 투표: |
|
Creator |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Tags
Filter strategies:
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
스크립트 |
2 | 4.9 ![]() |
98% | 54 ![]() |
117
![]()
1:57
|
17+ | |||
![]()
모든 레벨 25+ 기계류
|
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
N/A | 6 ![]() |
120
![]()
2:00
|
13+ | |||
![]()
As I didn't have the knockoff blingtron, I went with a lilBling, hope that helps the poor peoples like me :D
|
스크립트 |
2 | 4.7 ![]() |
100% | 3 ![]() |
120
![]()
2:00
|
13+ | ||
![]()
25 July 24: Updated script so BB won't Explode if the ability is chosen randomly.
Common pet variation in comments. |
스크립트 |
2 | 5.0 ![]() |
100% | 3 ![]() |
115
![]()
1:55
|
11+ | ||
![]()
I haven't gotten around to test it in game but it seems to be working good in pet sim. I love 마이크로낙스
|
스크립트 |
2 | 0.0 ![]() |
100% | 0 ![]() |
129
![]()
2:09
|
14+ |
Incl. steps:
Substitutes:
1 / 2
꼬꼬마골렘 | HH |
강철의 샛별 | PP |
판다렌 기계용 | SS |
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Now that is one cute cat!
1
Puppy
글 올리기 2024-10-26 21:03:33
3
Deathrall
글 올리기 2024-10-07 19:53:09
change(#3)[enemy(#3).active]
use(Supercharge:208)[self.aura(Wind-Up:458).exists]
use(Decoy:334)
use(Thunderbolt:779)
use(#1)
Some geeks like it simple. ;D
1
marcelnebunu
글 올리기 2024-09-17 20:03:25
change(#2) [enemy(#2).active]
use(Arcane Blast:421)
use(Supercharge:208) [self.aura(Wind-Up:458).exists]
use(Wind-Up:459)
use(Decoy:334)
use(Thunderbolt:779)
use(Breath:115)
4
Fawkes612#1158
글 올리기 2024-09-07 19:46:19
-2
Dannysdruid
글 올리기 2024-08-24 14:41:18
-- Flicker Battle
use(Arcane Blast) [enemy(#1).hp > 0]
change(#2) [enemy(#1).dead]
-- Iron Starlette comes in
use(Wind-Up)
use(Supercharge)
use(Wind-Up)
change(#3) [self.dead]
-- Mechanical Pandaren Dragonling comes in
use(Decoy)
use(Thunderbolt)
use(Breath) [enemy(#3).hp > 0]
(edited)
5
schlumpf#2707
글 올리기 2024-09-05 21:22:20
- Also, it is good style to have a "change(next)" in it, which takes care of switching to the next pet in case your own pet dies too early for whatever reason.
- Lastly, please keep in mind that the script does *not* work on a per-round-basis, but always runs top to bottom, which means that
use(Wind-Up)
use(Supercharge)
use(Wind-Up)
does not make sense as it is equivalent to
use(Wind-Up)
use(Supercharge)
. You need to add additional conditions there for it to work as intended, otherwise it will just use Wind-Up twice asap instead of buffing up first. It works in your case because it doesn't really need the buff, it crits for enough to kill the enemy without the buff.
In this case, your script could be
-- do a 1:1 based on enemy
change(#2) [ enemy(#2).active ]
change(#3) [ enemy(#3).active ]
-- wind up, buff up (second wind up is not done: windup is present, but there is no buff), then wind up hit
use(windupbuff:459) [ !self.aura(windup:458).exists ]
use(winduphit:459) [ self.aura(windup:458).exists & self.aura(buff:207).exists ]
use(buff:208)
-- note how arcane blast is down here with the other filler, because priority-based
-- implies it can be: no other condition above is met. that way, one can just group
-- semantics, in this case "all the fillers"
use(def:334)
use(big:779)
use(filler:115)
use(filler:421)
-- usually only this one is required, fights that actually do a 1:1 are rare, so the top
--two changes are mostly not there, just this one.
change(next)
1
ssfiit
글 올리기 2024-09-01 15:46:21
1
Obi-Wahn
글 올리기 2024-12-14 22:48:58
Und bei genauerer Betrachtung hat der Verfasser keine Ahnung wie Skripte funktionieren.
Deathrall in den englischen Kommentaren hat ein schönes kurzes Skript geschrieben, das auch mit der deutschen Version funktioniert. (edited)
1
Luzifee
글 올리기 2024-12-07 16:14:06
1
Iccy#2476
글 올리기 2024-09-23 23:23:29
새로운 댓글: