Strategy added by Elfyr
39
39
Average rating: |
4.6 |
Ratings: |
92 |
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters. |
|||||||||
Script |
2 | 4.9 | 97% | 35 | 190
3:10
|
27+ | |||
I've tried this 4 times and have won each time. I know this fight has a lot of RNG with the ability order so, there may be cases where this doesn't work. However, each of the 4 attempts I did have resulted in a pretty clean win, with the 3rd Anomalus having atleast 600 HP at the end.
Let me know if you run into any cases where this fails, thank you! |
Script |
2 | 4.8 | 100% | 13 | 112
1:52
|
14+ | ||
Any Level 25+ Magic
|
The idea of this battle is to kill the backline pets and finish off Lifft with any pet.
I used Netherspawn, Spawn of Netherspawn - but Lifft is usually so low any pet will do. Has worked 5/5 times. |
2 | 4.6 | N/A | 39 | 138
2:18
|
20+ | ||
This is based on the original 10.1 PTR tamer pets' stats/quality/etc. It might need adjustments on last-minute changes (potential nerfs).
**Normally we would pass turns with a faster pet when the enemy pet is Underwater, but Nether Blast will even buff up when it misses, so I start passing turns when it is maxed. *** Swole will use Headbutt and Dive on cooldown, with Headbutt being the highest priority. |
Script |
2 | 4.8 | 98% | 4 | 117
1:57
|
18+ | ||
All spiky dude strat!
Lord Basilton can solo enemies 1 and 3, so it's mostly just getting other pets to take out the second guy. I realized while working on a leveling strat with his lordship that I had two magic pets at one point, so might as well add a third, and then, well, might as well make them all spiky! (I also have a version with Jiggles and Baa'l that works similarly) The significance of the second pet is Celestial Blessing for pet #3 when they come in, giving them a chance to kill off (or nearly kill off) the second enemy. |
Script |
2 | 4.2 | 70% | 2 | 260
4:20
|
37+ | ||
RNG |
2 | 3.7 | N/A | 4 | 115
1:55
|
17 | |||
takes forever
|
Script |
2 | 0.0 | 99% | 0 | 220
3:40
|
37+ |
Incl. steps:
Any Level 25+ Magic
Skills: Any
Breed: Any
Substitutes:
1 / 2
The idea of this battle is to kill the backline pets and finish off Lifft with any pet.
I used Netherspawn, Spawn of Netherspawn - but Lifft is usually so low any pet will do.
Has worked 5/5 times.
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
What an Up-Lift-ing fellow!
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsMorti
wrote on 2024-05-19 19:35:46
9
You must be logged in to vote on commentsNefalien
wrote on 2023-05-20 09:24:54
use(#2) [!enemy.aura(Unter Wasser:830).exists & self(#1).active]
use(#2) [self(#2).active]
use(#3) [!enemy.aura(Unter Wasser:830).exists & !self(#3).active]
use(#1)
change(next)
1
You must be logged in to vote on comments(OP) Elfyr
wrote on 2023-07-14 18:13:21
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsRysana
wrote on 2023-11-26 00:46:51
From DragonsAfterDark strat: (We don't have the quill.)
"grixxis wrote on 5/10/2023
Used Trunks (2/1/1) as the third pet. Headbutt on cd, Ethereal to dodge dive (priority move), and fill with Smash"
4
You must be logged in to vote on commentsKillerMoyashi13
wrote on 2023-08-28 09:49:53
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsTigrari
wrote on 2023-09-19 06:18:32
3
You must be logged in to vote on commentsSunshine529
wrote on 2023-07-19 12:53:54
if [!enemy.aura(Underwater:830).exists]
use(Void Nova:2356)
use(Poison Protocol:1954)
use(Arcane Storm:589)
endif
use(Amplify Magic:488) [enemy.aura(Underwater:830).exists]
use(#1)
change(next)
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsGráinne
wrote on 2023-05-10 12:19:20
For example, you require Anomalus to have over 1034 HP. But Anomalus, with its one breed, has exactly and only 1034 HP.
Defensive specification of requirements can be a good thing to do, in case later pets are added with the same moveset but different stats, but even when doing this, you should try to allow the pet you actually mean to be included.
If you require at least 1034 health, you should specify that as Health > 1033. Since you have specified health > 1034, the site can't locate any breed that matches, and so calls it "Uncertain", and shows me a yellow warning telling me I don't have a pet that matches the requirements.
There are cases where the site shows or elevates strats to specific people depending on whether they have a matching species/breed in their collection. Your strat will rule itself out by being impossible to match.
I would not think that you need to specify any restrictions on Anomalus at all, but if you do, make them possible to attain. (edited)
5
You must be logged in to vote on commentsDragonsAfterDark
wrote on 2023-05-14 03:24:38
As to the strat itself, I would definitely recommend something with Beast attacks in slot 3. Lifft still had > 1k hp when the backline died, and the wrong pet there can result in a failure due to not being able to out damage the heal + Shell Armor.
A couple of the new pets this xpac, Kobaldt & Lord Basilton, have a nice speed stat, a beast attack, and Tranquility to mitigate Dive damage.
1
You must be logged in to vote on comments(OP) Elfyr
wrote on 2023-07-14 18:15:53
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsmonowai
wrote on 2023-07-04 06:27:34
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsAur
wrote on 2023-07-02 19:26:14
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsBorisMorosov
wrote on 2023-06-18 04:53:46
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsdawni
wrote on 2023-05-27 17:08:39
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsMoonii#1265
wrote on 2023-05-19 14:19:56
1
You must be logged in to vote on comments(OP) Elfyr
wrote on 2023-05-17 19:55:07
0
You must be logged in to vote on commentsElaeana#1554
wrote on 2023-05-15 23:24:10
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsBurntGinger#1399
wrote on 2023-05-10 05:26:41
0
You must be logged in to vote on commentsProchea wrote on 2023-05-09 21:28:28
New Comment: