Estratégia adicionada por Eekwibble
19
19
|
Média de Avaliação: |
4.4 |
|
Avaliações: |
17 |
|
Seu voto: |
|
Creator |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
Etiquetas
Filtro de estratégias:
Essas opções redefinem todos os outros filtros de classificação.
|
 |
|||||||
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
|
|
Nível 1+ Script |
2 | 4.6  |
N / D | 126  |
165
2:45
|
25+ | |
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
|
This is a slightly modified version of Ilyssa'a suicide strat. Line 6 of the TDScript will need the '669hp' modifying down if using MPD instead of the Zep.
|
Nível 1+ Script |
2 | 4.4 |
N / D | 19 |
135
2:15
|
20 | |
|
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
|
This is a modification of Kurasu#2861's strategy
Using Dragonetinho Onírico in place of Protodragonete de Esmeralda I could have posed it in comment but I find it easier to have all of it with script in a strategy. I believe this to be slightly better for the Dragonetinho Onírico's Chama Curativa is enough and makes the fight quicker, compared to Protodragonete de Esmeralda's going into Sonho Esmeralda vs the self healing last pet. Regarding breeds, I've set pet breeds as the one I used and that I tested the strategy with, I think those are the most suited but it can likely work with other breeds if you don't have the PP one. |
Raça (breed) Nível 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N / D | 10 |
110
1:50
|
15+ | |
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
|
Considerably slower compared to the use of Nexus or Stormborn whelp, but if you are leveling pets, this one gives you two pet level-up slots instead of just one.
EDIT 05/24/2022: Very slight tweak for wording and efficiency but steps are still essentially the same. |
Aleatório Nível 1+ |
2 | 4.3 |
N / D | 8 |
245
4:05
|
38+ | |
|
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
|
This is a fairly quick and efficient strategy, allowing your leveling pet a fairly safe trip through.
I have explored this with a few other dragonkin in place of the Emerald Proto-whelp, but for durability, I find the ubiquitous Emerald Powerhouse to be the best for this one so far as the secondary pet. Script thanks to NabuArat |
Nível 1+ Script |
2 | 4.1 |
N / D | 10 |
105
1:45
|
14+ | |
Qualquer Nível 3+ Mascote
|
Approximately 1% failure rate
Damage is from flying, allows crits, can tick mech/magic box |
Raça (breed) Nível 3+ Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N / D | 1 |
107
1:47
|
16 | |
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
|
There is a bit of RNG on the first turn if you pet sleep, which will affect the timer a bit, but won't make you lose the battle.
|
Aleatório Nível 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N / D | 2 |
88
1:28
|
11 | |
|
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
|
This is an amalgam of strategies from here and from YouTube.
Unfortunately, if Chrominius gets slept more than twice, this strat can get a little dicey. |
Aleatório Nível 1+ |
2 | 5.0 |
N / D | 1 |
175
2:55
|
26+ | |
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
|
Nível 1+ |
2 | 5.0 |
N / D | 3 |
163
2:43
|
18 | ||
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
|
Should be faster than the Emerald Protowhelp strat, since you spend less time dreaming and more time lowering enemy health before you get to the Air Spirit
|
Nível 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N / D | 3 |
270
4:30
|
35+ | |
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
|
"No sleeping" stategy, someone write TDscript please
|
Raça (breed) Aleatório Nível 1+ |
2 | 5.0 |
N / D | 0 |
127
2:07
|
17 | |
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
|
Aleatório Nível 1+ Traiçoeiro Script |
2 | 4.5 |
N / D | 2 |
185
3:05
|
24+ | ||
|
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
|
I use an H/B IbP-W but it should work with H/H as well
|
Aleatório Nível 1+ Script |
2 | 3.7 |
N / D | 2 |
265
4:25
|
37+ | |
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
|
Time: ~1:25
NOTE: Dragoleta Etérea has to be S/S breed! NOTE: If you are stunned in Turn 1 start fight over! (25% chance) --> TD Script will quit the fight in that case! It's a fast strategy. Tested 11/12/2020 |
Raça (breed) Aleatório Nível 1+ Script |
2 | 2.3 |
N / D | 2 |
98
1:38
|
15+ | |
|
Emerald Proto-Whelp will solo this 99% of the time, The other pets are for the rare occasion it dies. I dont like losing 1% so i added some insurance.
|
Script |
2 | 0.0 |
N / D | 0 |
230
3:50
|
33 | |
|
Qualquer Nível 5+ Mascote
Qualquer Mascote
|
|
Nível 5+ |
2 | 0.0 |
N / D | 0 |
215
3:35
|
34+ | |
|
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
|
Saintgabrial
|
Nível 1+ |
2 | 0.0 |
N / D | 0 |
173
2:53
|
25+ | |
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
|
If you try to fail, and succeed, which have you done?
|
Nível 1+ Script |
2 | 0.0 |
N / D | 0 |
210
3:30
|
27+ | |
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
|
|
Raça (breed) Nível 1+ Script |
2 | 0.0 |
N / D | 0 |
205
3:25
|
33 | |
|
2 | 1.0 |
N / D | 0 |
138
2:18
|
18 |
Incl. passos:
Qualquer Nível 1+ Mascote
Substitutos:
1 / 2
This is a slightly modified version of Ilyssa'a suicide strat. Line 6 of the TDScript will need the '669hp' modifying down if using MPD instead of the Zep.
| Antes | Depois | Ganho de Experiência | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ➜ | 13 | 5981 |
| 2 | ➜ | 13 | 6353 |
| 3 | ➜ | 14 | 6683 |
| 4 | ➜ | 14 | 6971 |
| 5 | ➜ | 14 | 7219 |
| 6 | ➜ | 15 | 7425 |
| 7 | ➜ | 15 | 7590 |
| 8 | ➜ | 16 | 7714 |
| 9 | ➜ | 16 | 7796 |
| 10 | ➜ | 17 | 7838 |
| 11 | ➜ | 17 | 7838 |
| 12 | ➜ | 18 | 7796 |
| 13 | ➜ | 19 | 7714 |
| 14 | ➜ | 19 | 7590 |
| 15 | ➜ | 20 | 7425 |
| 16 | ➜ | 20 | 7219 |
| 17 | ➜ | 21 | 6971 |
| 18 | ➜ | 22 | 6683 |
| 19 | ➜ | 22 | 6353 |
| 20 | ➜ | 23 | 5981 |
| 21 | ➜ | 23 | 5569 |
| 22 | ➜ | 24 | 5115 |
| 23 | ➜ | 25 | 3900 |
| 24 | ➜ | 25 | 1980 |
|
Chapéu de Safari |
|
|
Petisco Menor |
|
|
Petisco |
|
|
Chapéu Darkmoon |
|
|
Pet Battle Week |
|
= |
Níveis de animal de estimação para 25 com perda mínima de XP |
|
|
= |
XP adicional acima do nível 25 é perdido |
|
2 Min 15 Sec
20 
2018-08-13 10:20:22
2018-08-13 10:20:22
32,890
Para melhor exibição da sua estratégia, por favor siga estas orientações:
Para melhor exibição da sua estratégia, por favor siga estas orientações:
Para melhor exibição da sua estratégia, por favor siga estas orientações:
Para melhor exibição da sua estratégia, por favor siga estas orientações:
Para melhor exibição da sua estratégia, por favor siga estas orientações:
Para melhor exibição da sua estratégia, por favor siga estas orientações:
Para melhor exibição da sua estratégia, por favor siga estas orientações:
Para melhor exibição da sua estratégia, por favor siga estas orientações:
Para melhor exibição da sua estratégia, por favor siga estas orientações:
Ssssssswwwoooooossshhhhh
1
pardall
escreveu em 2020-12-03 12:15:14
UPDATE: Tried to kill him again and I'm not able anymore. It's very RNG dependant. (editado)
1
Ta
escreveu em 2021-04-30 17:23:53
1
trixiebink
escreveu em 2020-10-15 02:35:37
1
(OP) Eekwibble
escreveu em 2019-01-21 20:36:00
1
doomedcow
escreveu em 2018-08-21 14:12:32
2
(OP) Eekwibble
escreveu em 2018-08-21 15:44:14
I bet if you tried it another 8 times it would work every one of them, though. Two attempts isn't a great sample size.
3
Gráinne
escreveu em 2018-08-22 04:59:27
Personally, I wouldn't call anything under a 95% strat Reliable, maybe 99%. Tamer levelling strats are expected to fail so rarely that it's a statistical blip.
1
Gráinne
escreveu em 2018-08-23 13:52:52
1. Chrominius did not survive to face Whispertail
2. Needed Missile after Thunderbolt on PAS
3. Whispertail enters with >740, so doesn't die to SoP (3 times)
I could see my way round those deviations clearly enough, though perhaps a beginner wouldn't, and I would say this strat is reliable enough to post here, but is that reliable enough for an extra "Reliable" tag within the context of what people expect from this site, when the user has to compensate for RNG? A script would also need to compensate for these cases. That may be a conversation that needs to work itself out.
1
doomedcow
escreveu em 2018-08-27 13:00:37
2
Gráinne
escreveu em 2018-08-27 19:13:45
1
(OP) Eekwibble
escreveu em 2018-08-28 21:17:45
Sorry for my over-optimism. ;P
1
Gráinne
escreveu em 2018-08-29 07:00:54
I completely understand how tempting it is to feel that your strat is great when you've just worked it out. Oh yeah, I understand that very well. :)
And the issue affects more than just you; I raised it in the Discord well before I saw this. I think long-term, it might be better to tag strats as "Reliable" based on high number of votes based on stars received, or by the number of people making reports with success on their first tries. Thing is, if you don't actually math it out, it takes a LOT of attempts to determine the reliability of a strat - I'd say about 100.
And then we have the question: how reliable do people expect a strat to be, to be tagged "Reliable" here? I expect all strats here to be above 90%, except challenge strats with built-in RNG. So is "Reliable" 99%? 99.9%?
The conversation needs to work itself out. I trust Aranesh and the community to find a good answer. Thanks for participating contructively. :)
1
Gráinne
escreveu em 2018-08-29 07:31:13
If my 90% quick survey is right, then your strat fits right in with the rest - neither "Reliable" nor "RNG". I'd save "RNG" for those Family strats where it is really needed.
1
(OP) Eekwibble
escreveu em 2018-08-29 16:31:01
So someone posts a strat that is almost there but not quite 100% reliable and 11 people find the flaw before the kink is ironed out.
Well, there's no way to balance it between 5-star votes, first time success subs and 'Reliable' tags that I can see, but, I'll leave it in your capable hands.
1
Zafferg
escreveu em 2018-08-24 06:03:06
Novo Comentário: