Strategy added by Lazey
62
62
Average rating: |
4.9 |
Ratings: |
52 |
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters. |
|||||||||
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
You had your chance Remte.
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 | 100% | 23 | 22
0:22
|
3 | |
Any Level 1+ Pet
Any Pet
|
Bloodtusk:4A8K:ZL:11141BB:ZR0:P:112:1:9::::
Elemental level pets maybe need more HP. Single target fight, so don't expect much XP for your Level Pet. |
Breed Level 1+ Script |
2 | 4.9 | 100% | 62 | 35
0:35
|
5-6 | |
Any Level 1+ Pet
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
This allows two pets to get levelling XP, although the XP from this single target battle is not great. Neither levelling pet will take any damage. The HP numbers in the steps assume a rare quality level 25 Draenei Micro Defender is being used.
|
Level 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 | 97% | 10 | 40
0:40
|
6 | |
Any Level 25+ Pet
Any Level 25+ Pet
|
Script |
2 | 4.5 | 98% | 12 | 36
0:36
|
6 | ||
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
Script Staff Pick |
2 | 5.0 | 100% | 1 | 27
0:27
|
3-5 | ||
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 | 98% | 2 | 40
0:40
|
5 | ||
4 rounds.
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 | 4% | 5 | 31
0:31
|
4 | ||
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
As of the date this was created, Killbot 9000 is the only pet powerful enough to pull off this strategy in two moves.
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 | 100% | 2 | 18
0:18
|
2 | |
Any Pet
|
2 | 5.0 | N/A | 1 | 52
0:52
|
7 | |||
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Level 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 | 4% | 0 | 30
0:30
|
4 | ||
4 Rounds
|
Script |
2 | 4.5 | 7% | 0 | 34
0:34
|
4 | ||
Any Pet
|
RNG Script |
2 | 0.0 | 35% | 0 | 43
0:43
|
5 | ||
Any Level 17+ Pet
|
Прошу не судить строго, это мой первый пробный гайд)
|
RNG Level 17+ Script |
2 | 0.0 | 85% | 0 | 73
1:13
|
9 | |
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
Tried only with H/P, please let me know if it doesn't work with other breeds, I will edit then.
|
2 | 0.0 | N/A | 0 | 31
0:31
|
4 | ||
Fast, 100% reliable and using common, EASILY and WIDELY available pets ;)
Enjoy. ----------------------- Fight time: 5-6 rounds ----------------------- |
Script |
2 | 0.0 | 100% | 0 | 31
0:31
|
5-6 | ||
For when you are finishing the day and just want to squish something flat. The pets are all from BFA (Mechagon and Island Expeditions respectively). The frogs do a good chunk of damage fast then deny the Crawg a corpse to eat. The Dragon has a strong attack. Health info is just a guess since the frog attack is proportional to its base health.
|
Breed |
2 | 0.0 | N/A | 0 | 37
0:37
|
5+ | ||
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
No RNG involved. Pretty easy and fast strat.
|
2 | 0.0 | N/A | 0 | 43
0:43
|
7 | ||
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
Open with Exposed Wounds and use Batter until Bloodtusk dies. Tested with a rare raptor.
|
Script |
2 | 0.0 | 100% | 0 | 30
0:30
|
5-6 | |
Any Pet
|
One puuuunch ! :p
|
RNG Script |
2 | 0.0 | 96% | 0 | 40
0:40
|
6 | |
Any Level 25+ Pet
Any Level 25+ Pet
|
I’ve come to view Jesus much the way I view Elvis. I love the guy but the fan clubs really freak me out.
Repeatable Pet Leveling battles can be found Here. Thank you. |
Breed Script |
2 | 0.0 | 100% | 0 | 38
0:38
|
5 | |
2 | 0.0 | N/A | 0 | 46
0:46
|
5 | ||||
Any Pet
|
RNG Script |
2 | 0.0 | 62% | 0 | 89
1:29
|
8 | ||
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
Script |
2 | 0.0 | 100% | 0 | 23
0:23
|
3 | ||
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
Chaos Beam until Accursed Hexxer drops below 650 HP then Drain Blood and continue Chaos Beam. Sometimes you can skip Drain Blood if you get lucky crits on Chaos Beam.
|
2 | 0.0 | N/A | 0 | 42
0:42
|
7 | ||
2 | 0.0 | N/A | 0 | 50
0:50
|
5 | ||||
Any Pet
Any Pet
|
Shop Script Unobtainable |
2 | 0.0 | 100% | 0 | 27
0:27
|
4 | ||
Any Level 1+ Pet
Any Level 1+ Pet
|
Similar to Lazy's strat.
5 turns (this script) MUST be H/H breed. |
Breed Level 1+ Script |
2 | 0.0 | 100% | 0 | 42
0:42
|
5 |
Incl. steps:
Any Level 1+ Pet
>112 |
Any Pet
Bloodtusk:4A8K:ZL:11141BB:ZR0:P:112:1:9::::
Elemental level pets maybe need more HP.
Single target fight, so don't expect much XP for your Level Pet.
Before | After | Experience Gain | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ➜ | 5 | 479 |
2 | ➜ | 5 | 508 |
3 | ➜ | 5 | 535 |
4 | ➜ | 6 | 558 |
5 | ➜ | 6 | 578 |
6 | ➜ | 7 | 594 |
7 | ➜ | 8 | 607 |
8 | ➜ | 9 | 617 |
9 | ➜ | 9 | 624 |
10 | ➜ | 10 | 627 |
11 | ➜ | 11 | 627 |
12 | ➜ | 12 | 624 |
13 | ➜ | 13 | 617 |
14 | ➜ | 14 | 607 |
15 | ➜ | 15 | 594 |
16 | ➜ | 16 | 578 |
17 | ➜ | 17 | 558 |
18 | ➜ | 18 | 535 |
19 | ➜ | 19 | 508 |
20 | ➜ | 20 | 479 |
21 | ➜ | 21 | 446 |
22 | ➜ | 22 | 409 |
23 | ➜ | 23 | 370 |
24 | ➜ | 24 | 327 |
Safari Hat |
|
Lesser Pet Treat |
|
Pet Treat |
|
Darkmoon Hat |
|
Pet Battle Week |
= |
Pet levels to 25 with minimal XP lost |
|
= |
Additional XP above level 25 is lost |
|
Iron Starlette | PP |
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
I think we've established that "Ca-Caw Ca-Caw" and "Tookie Tookie" don't work.
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsFacetious#1105
wrote on 2024-03-09 16:20:42
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsGhostCell#1899
wrote on 2023-11-20 17:08:37
4
You must be logged in to vote on commentsTake wrote on 2018-08-16 04:51:29
0
You must be logged in to vote on commentsJessica wrote on 2018-08-20 07:24:46
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsEnderes#1241
wrote on 2022-10-20 23:34:50
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsKalagren
wrote on 2022-10-04 13:24:16
H/H Iron Starlette
1 Wind-Up
2 Wind-Up (If it crits, move to step 4)
3 Toxic Smoke
4 Toxic Smoke
5 Explode
Would this be best in a new strat post?
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsCloud
wrote on 2021-07-05 00:33:02
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsdetain
wrote on 2021-05-25 03:26:29
standby [ round=1 & !self.level.max]
change(#2)
use(Powerball:566) [ round=4 & self.power<341 ]
use(Supercharge:208) [ self.aura(Wind-Up:458).exists ]
use(Wind-Up:459)
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsthebiped
wrote on 2020-11-02 01:40:06
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsGráinne
wrote on 2020-11-02 02:24:47
Then, user rankings tend to favour those strats that are simple, use common pets, and have a low fail rate, so a lot of users never see failures. Until they do. :P
I'm always amused by these low-probability failures; it's like seeing someone reacting to being almost struck by lightning - but without the genuine harm, ofc. :)
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsbloodbull
wrote on 2020-10-20 05:54:48
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsMeddah
wrote on 2020-10-19 16:04:39
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsBurzolog wrote on 2018-10-04 23:38:23
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsWyrdrune
wrote on 2020-05-22 14:04:12
1
You must be logged in to vote on comments(OP) Lazey
wrote on 2020-05-24 07:16:02
-3
You must be logged in to vote on commentsMorgol
wrote on 2020-02-26 22:44:48
5
You must be logged in to vote on commentsGráinne
wrote on 2020-02-27 04:54:54
There are several people who investigate reports of problems with strategies on Xu-Fu's. There are designated Strategy Curators, and other regulars who read comments and are interested in the latest.
In my experience, when people leave a short "It didn't work" note, they usually made a mistake. Maybe they used a pet with the wrong Speed, maybe they didn't do a Pass where it was indicated, sometimes they were even using the team and strat from a completely different battle. :)
Sometimes there genuinely is a problem with the strat. This is where the Curators and others come in, checking the strat for weaknesses, and fixing it or removing it if it can't be fixed.
Since most failure reports with no details are wrong, it's not good to waste people's time investigating them. Instead, help them by providing the information they need.
If the strat failed for you, and you want your comment to be taken seriously:
1. Specify EXACTLY which species and breeds you used. Make sure all your pets were Rare (Blue).
2. Specify whether you read the strategy from the site and executed it manually, or downloaded and used the tdScript.
3. Specify EXACTLY where the first unexpected thing happened, the first thing that deviated from what the strat predicts. What died too early? What didn't die when it was supposed to? What attack missed?
4. If possible, provide a log. You can see your log in the Pet Battle tab of your chat box. You can pull that out, make it bigger, screenshot it. Better still, you can use the addon PetBattleLogKeeper: https://www.curseforge.com/wow/addons/petbattlelogkeeper from Curseforge, and do /pblk and Save Battle when the battle you want to log is complete.
Almost any strat can fail to a really unlucky string of crits, and some difficult challenge strats like the Family ones may fail more than anyone likes, but the people behind this site do their best to promote well-working strats.
Do your part. Provide useful information.
In this case, I've been using a Starlette on this battle since the start of BfA, with not even the remotest thought of a chance of failing, so I'm very sceptical. (edited)
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsWyrdrune
wrote on 2020-05-22 14:44:02
1) you might want to add the rarity to what people should specify about their battle pets.
4) After some searching, I think you mean PetBattleLogKeeper: https://www.curseforge.com/wow/addons/petbattlelogkeeper ? Going to give it a try, even though it seems to be abandoned (nearly two years since last update)
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsGráinne
wrote on 2020-05-22 17:39:05
It's not abandoned, exactly. Just not under active development, since it still works fine.
4
You must be logged in to vote on commentsEbbiemay
wrote on 2020-03-17 20:36:50
0
You must be logged in to vote on commentsVonZilla#1592
wrote on 2019-03-23 13:45:47
0
You must be logged in to vote on commentsAnon wrote on 2019-03-17 16:01:03
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsJagûar
wrote on 2018-12-30 23:06:34
0
You must be logged in to vote on commentsKlide wrote on 2018-12-21 11:43:08
0
You must be logged in to vote on commentsVosk wrote on 2018-11-23 15:03:29
4
You must be logged in to vote on commentsLoyalar
wrote on 2018-08-15 20:11:17
0
You must be logged in to vote on commentsOthros wrote on 2018-11-15 19:09:28
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsKay
wrote on 2018-11-15 11:39:41
3
You must be logged in to vote on commentsJaskra#1161
wrote on 2018-09-09 14:07:30
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsgetrektfucker
wrote on 2018-11-09 12:44:20
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsRavynsur
wrote on 2018-08-27 11:59:45
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsEekwibble
wrote on 2018-08-21 11:44:55
It works exactly the same like this:
change(#2) [ round=2 ]
ability(Powerball:566) [ round=4 & self.power<341 ]
ability(Supercharge:208) [ self.aura(Wind-Up:458).exists ]
ability(#1)
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsZafferg
wrote on 2018-08-21 08:31:39
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsPureArmour wrote on 2018-08-20 14:52:10
0
You must be logged in to vote on commentsBooker wrote on 2018-10-16 05:18:38
1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsBlackmu
wrote on 2018-08-27 03:19:20
0
You must be logged in to vote on commentsЛадоша wrote on 2020-01-23 13:02:51
0
You must be logged in to vote on commentsCD wrote on 2018-08-21 12:48:28
-1
You must be logged in to vote on commentsCD wrote on 2018-08-21 12:23:03
2
You must be logged in to vote on commentsDrunk Panda
wrote on 2018-08-15 15:21:40
New Comment: