Estrategia añadida por Aprune
|
Puntuación media: |
0 |
|
Puntuaciones: |
0 |
|
Tu voto: |
|
Creator |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
Etiquetas
Filtrar estrategias:
These options reset all other sorting filters.
|
 |
|||||||
Cualquier Elemental de nivel 25+
Cualquier Elemental de nivel 25+
|
I believe this strat can fail if you land a Crit with Claw in Round 3, and Blingtron 4999b kills himself with Armageddon before you can get your heal from Ravage. That should be a 5% chance. However, you can probably finish with your other pets, and this is otherwise a very clean, simple strategy.
Inspired by an anonymous comment https://wow-petguide.com/?Comment=69504 |
Script |
2 | 4.9  |
N/A | 88  |
135
2:15
|
15+ | |
|
9 rounds.
|
Script |
2 | 4.2 |
N/A | 8 |
85
1:25
|
9 | |
|
Cría de cobra guardiana is alt#1:
Use Mordedura until Bling is below 25.5% ~x3, then continue from turn 3 With P/P Duendecillo Hojaniza #3, you can use an S/S Sunglow Cobra Credit to @Remte for the blind "bug" |
Raza Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 0 |
72
1:12
|
7 | |
|
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 4 |
88
1:28
|
10 | |
Cualquier nivel 25+ Mascota
|
Pets are disguised as mechanical but take critter damage best.
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 2 |
136
2:16
|
14-16 | |
|
9
|
Tienda Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 2 |
108
1:48
|
9-10 | |
|
This is a fun battle. If you flub half way through but have a good understanding of the pets, you will be able to pull this off.
|
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 4 |
125
2:05
|
15+ | ||
|
Strategy added by Wasted_Wander
Tested several times and have no problem with this setup if you can write a TD script I would love to test and update this. |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 3 |
134
2:14
|
15+ | ||
|
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 0 |
102
1:42
|
9+ | |||
Cualquier mascota
Cualquier mascota
|
I used an H/P Fozling, but i think other breed should work
|
Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 0 |
160
2:40
|
18+ | |
Cualquier nivel 1+ Mascota
|
Haven't tested if S/S has enough damage or health (suspect it and P/S won't be crit proof)
If you don't care about the leveling pet just swap straight into Tarachnid and finish off final pet. |
Raza Nivel 1+ Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 4 |
92
1:32
|
12 | |
Cualquier nivel 2+ Mascota
|
WIP. I had this fail once due to big crits on both pets (I have plans to put in contingencies)
While a bit slow, I just love using Landro's Lil XT and if you have the store version it would probably be better due to more HP. |
RNG JCC Nivel 2+ Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 5 |
105
1:45
|
11 | |
|
9
|
Tienda Script |
2 | 5.0 |
N/A | 5 |
88
1:28
|
8-9 | |
Cualquier mascota
Cualquier mascota
|
Daesagos
|
Script No Obtenible |
2 | 4.8 |
N/A | 5 |
170
2:50
|
23+ | |
|
Cualquier mascota
|
Still works perfectly in 9.0, winning in 11 rounds (1 minute 20 seconds).
|
Raza Script |
2 | 3.7 |
N/A | 5 |
82
1:22
|
10+ | |
Cualquier nivel 4+ Mascota
|
The Amethyst Shale Hatchling practically solos this fight, simply use an 'explode' pet in the second slot to use when the last protector is in his Mechanical round for a little extra xp. Min 300 health on the level pet, more for Beasts, possibly less for Elemental. I have not tested other breeds of Shale Hatchling yet. Script should work relatively well for any exploding pets.
Tested 6/6 so far, ~21 rounds & 2:45 time |
Nivel 4+ Script |
2 | 3.8 |
N/A | 2 |
193
3:13
|
25+ | |
|
This strategy I created specifically to a guildie of mine who've just started collecting pets and to do pet battles. The other strategies didn't have pets that were all tradeable.
The third slot doesn't need to be a Frostfur Rat, it's merely what I used. I would advise it to be lvl 25 rare though |
2 | 2.5 |
N/A | 1 |
128
2:08
|
16-17 | ||
|
Level pet works but is 12 rounds
Just replace it into slot #2 |
Raza Script |
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 0 |
9999999- | 9 | |
|
Very Draft (very draft) team I used just this day (August 2018) but it worked well.
|
Tienda |
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 0 |
125
2:05
|
15+ | |
|
Ripping, Biting and Mauling. Wailing Lasher can use Blood in the Water or Toxic Fumes.
|
Tienda |
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 0 |
106
1:46
|
12+ | |
Cualquier mascota
|
Ruby Droplet (only had a HH breed at hand, but shouldn't fail with others anyway) will own this fight on itself, Chrominius is here *just in case*.
Third pet just to fill in the slot — don't waste time to XP here… Note : courtesy of Arowyn0210 from his comment on other strat. |
Script |
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 0 |
168
2:48
|
26+ | |
|
|
Script |
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 0 |
119
1:59
|
15 | |
Cualquier mascota
|
Not the fastest, but not the most complex either.
The Escudo reflectantes do not affect this rotation. |
Script |
2 | 0.0 |
N/A | 0 |
137
2:17
|
19 |
Incl. pasos:
Cualquier mascota
Ruby Droplet (only had a HH breed at hand, but shouldn't fail with others anyway) will own this fight on itself, Chrominius is here *just in case*.
Third pet just to fill in the slot — don't waste time to XP here…
Note : courtesy of Arowyn0210 from his comment on other strat.
| Antes | Después | Ganancia de Experiencia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ➜ | 2 | 120 |
| 2 | ➜ | 3 | 127 |
| 3 | ➜ | 4 | 134 |
| 4 | ➜ | 4 | 139 |
| 5 | ➜ | 5 | 144 |
| 6 | ➜ | 6 | 149 |
| 7 | ➜ | 7 | 152 |
| 8 | ➜ | 8 | 154 |
| 9 | ➜ | 9 | 156 |
| 10 | ➜ | 10 | 157 |
| 11 | ➜ | 11 | 157 |
| 12 | ➜ | 12 | 156 |
| 13 | ➜ | 13 | 154 |
| 14 | ➜ | 14 | 152 |
| 15 | ➜ | 15 | 149 |
| 16 | ➜ | 16 | 144 |
| 17 | ➜ | 17 | 139 |
| 18 | ➜ | 18 | 134 |
| 19 | ➜ | 19 | 127 |
| 20 | ➜ | 20 | 120 |
| 21 | ➜ | 21 | 111 |
| 22 | ➜ | 22 | 102 |
| 23 | ➜ | 23 | 92 |
| 24 | ➜ | 24 | 82 |
|
Sombrero de safari |
|
|
Chuchería inferior para mascotas |
|
|
Chuchería para mascotas |
|
|
Chistera de la Luna Negra |
|
|
Semana de Duelos de Mascotas |
|
= |
La mascota sube a nivel 25 con pérdida mínima de EXP |
|
|
= |
Se pierde la EXP adicional por encima del nivel 25 |
|
2 Min 48 Sec
26+ 
2019-06-14 06:09:13
2019-06-14 05:22:22
11,912
Poca EXP
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Estos tres son como transformers. Cuando termines la pelea, se habrán transformado en un montón de chatarra.
1
Eekwibble
escrito el 2019-06-14 09:58:58
ability(Plagued Blood:1043) [ round>1 & enemy.hp>140 ]
ability(Dive:564) [ round>2 & enemy.hp>140 ]
ability(Howl:362) [ enemy.hp>740 ]
ability(Surge of Power:593) [ enemy.hp>444 ]
ability(#1)
change(#2)
1
(OP) Aprune
escrito el 2019-06-14 12:45:59
Bite is the strongest ability, so it will get used, and will kill the remaining pet though…
If the enemy is above killing blow from Bite, then it will do the Howl & Surge, thus a kill too. Then again, Bite if the others are on cooldown.
But you still need Ruby Droplet to fail, which is still to be seen.
I just like to have my TD Scripts simple to read, when a change comes in, it's easiest to correct them ;)
1
Eekwibble
escrito el 2019-06-14 23:47:55
As for being easy to read, I don't see what your complaint is. Yours is unnecessarily long-winded, I just cleaned it up.
1
(OP) Aprune
escrito el 2019-06-15 03:39:30
I'm not complaining, we just have different views on how a script is fancy to read or not.
Good day ;)
1
Eekwibble
escrito el 2019-06-15 13:45:40
Since you use a specific breed of Droplet, it cannot be guaranteed to work through all scenarios with all breeds until they have all been tested. You acknowledge as much yourself by having the back-up in the first place. All my script does is ensure the correct abilities are used to finish the battle in the shortest number of rounds possible if the situation occurs (which, in my experience, is what most battlers look for). Well, that and shrinks it from the unnecessary 10 lines to just 6.
It's simple and perfectly readable. It's also easier to adjust, not harder, because there are fewer conditionals.
Nuevo comentario: