Estrategia añadida por Lazey
90
90
Puntuación media: |
4.6 |
Puntuaciones: |
72 |
Tu voto: |
|
Creator |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Etiquetas
Filtrar estrategias:
These options reset all other sorting filters. |
||||||||||
1 |
This is based on the original 10.1 PTR tamer pets' stats/quality/etc. It might need adjustments on last-minute changes (potential nerfs).
|
Script |
2 | 4.6 | 90 | 95
1:35
|
9-11 | |||
2 |
Suspect subject to multiple.
Can use Acechahondo cantaespina as alt #2 |
RNG Script |
2 | 4.2 | 21 | 79
1:19
|
8 | |||
3 | Script |
2 | 4.7 | 10 | 104
1:44
|
13 | ||||
4 |
Sometimes Ikky Lives longer and this fight can be done a little faster.
|
RNG Script |
2 | 3.4 | 14 | 102
1:42
|
11+ | |||
5 |
Original strategy by user Xayrien on Wowhead:
https://www.wowhead.com/npc=204926/delver-mardei#comments:id=5614630 (Some RNG involved) |
RNG |
2 | 3.7 | 10 | 116
1:56
|
16+ | |||
6 | RNG |
2 | 3.9 | 4 | 76
1:16
|
8+ | ||||
7 |
The key is to counter the first two pets using any of their best counters and finish them off at minimum one for one.
At the last pet choose a pet specifically for its Life Exchange and Dragonkin type abilities with magic damage. When last pet enters, use Life Exchange to cure yourself from the earlier splash damage and bring the enemy HP within striking distance of triggering the Dragonkin damage buff special. The last pet should be finished in three abilities in this fashion. |
RNG Script |
2 | 5.0 | 0 | 102
1:42
|
11+ | |||
8 | Script |
2 | 4.6 | 2 | 95
1:35
|
11+ | ||||
9 |
Less than 0.25% chance this fails
Acechahondo cantaespina works as alt #2 |
Tienda Script |
2 | 4.0 | 3 | 68
1:08
|
7 | |||
10 |
Found in wowhead comments. I just created the script.
|
RNG Script |
2 | 3.1 | 3 | 100
1:40
|
11 | |||
11 |
The only way I've had this fail is if Muar gets stunned immediately upon entering the battle, which happened once in 30+ run throughs so far.
Please let me know if you have issues! |
RNG Script |
2 | 3.0 | 0 | 105
1:45
|
12-13 | |||
12 |
Credit for the strategy goes to njpotter90 on Wowhead. This is a variation as the original strat posted required a Hungry Burrower from the Wild Hunt paragon cache in place of the 2nd pet used here.
Dustie is a bit of a wild card in this battle regardless of team comp. Once he comes in after turn 9, it's entirely dependant on his ability usage when Roggy dies. However, even with crits and RNG from which abilities Dustie uses, multiple battles have confirmed this team comp reliably wins the match. |
RNG |
2 | 0.0 | 0 | 135
2:15
|
15+ |
Incl. pasos:
This is based on the original 10.1 PTR tamer pets' stats/quality/etc. It might need adjustments on last-minute changes (potential nerfs).
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
When one is in Zaralek Cavern, one should delve deeply into its treasures.
0
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosfantasma
escrito el 2024-02-11 16:33:12
2
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosGráinne
escrito el 2024-02-12 16:44:07
It can be very useful as part of an arithmetic analysis of a strat, by generating possible combinations and conditions that are worth looking at, but it also generates false positives and false negatives.
Quoting its numbers without checking the battle yourself doesn't really accomplish much.
3
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosMutanis
escrito el 2024-02-15 15:09:19
Here is a correct version and it looks reliable:
Link to PetSim (editado)
2
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentarios(OP) Lazey
escrito el 2024-02-22 20:25:08
2
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosAntilles
escrito el 2024-01-07 15:50:08
4
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentarios(OP) Lazey
escrito el 2024-01-08 22:59:04
There's a "Test" button when you have Pet Battle Scripts open in a fight. When you click that, it should show you the next action without performing it. Where does it look different from the written strategy?
2
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosShelecktra
escrito el 2023-11-20 20:09:16
0
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosGráinne
escrito el 2023-11-20 21:23:13
I have been using this strat myself since start of the expansion and in fact used it half an hour ago on an alt. It has never failed for me.
There are no valid substitutes or alternate breeds.
Are you sure you followed the instructions correctly?
3
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosnomisuke
escrito el 2023-12-06 19:50:48
1
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosGráinne
escrito el 2023-12-07 02:10:15
But.
AFAIK, Tempe has an equal chance to use any ability in his first round. And a crit is a 5% chance. So that would be a 1-in-60 event.
If we say it could happen on either Tempe's first round or second, we would have a 1-in-30 chance.
Possible, but very unlikely to happen 4 times in a row.
1
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosGráinne
escrito el 2023-12-09 07:44:01
Tempe's first attack was Conflag and it crit for 950 and killed my Emmi on her first round.
I followed the strat as listed and still won handily.
So that 1-in-60 chance on its own is not enough to spoil the strat.
P.S. I saved the log in case anyone wants to analyze. (editado)
1
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosAurione#1660
escrito el 2023-12-08 04:04:29
0
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosTex escrito el 2023-11-19 07:01:51
1
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosHuntix#11505
escrito el 2023-11-23 01:07:16
1
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosTex escrito el 2023-11-26 07:14:07
0
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosSquatcher97 escrito el 2023-11-10 01:59:51
1
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosQpe#21155
escrito el 2023-11-08 10:21:32
-4
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosdarrthbt escrito el 2023-05-26 13:54:24
Ikky, Hydraling, Chrominius
Ikky destroys Swaggy, and debuffs Tempe. If Tempe doesn't use his damage shield, he can even survive long enough to debuff Dustie, but this is rare.
Hydraling destroys Tempe, and uses Whirlpool on Dustie.
Chrominius debuffs and obliterates Dustie, even if Whirlpool doesn't happen.
string: Delver Mardei:683U:11101FS:12201G5:1120140:
Script:
ability(Flock) [self(#1).active & enemy.aura(Black Claw).exists]
ability(Black Claw) [self(#1).active]
ability(Swallow You Whole) [self(#2).active & enemy(#2).active]
ability(Whirlpool) [self(#2).active & enemy(#3).active]
ability(Howl)
ability(Surge of Power)
change(next)
-6
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosdarthBT escrito el 2023-06-02 01:25:37
10
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosKalagren
escrito el 2023-06-02 03:33:20
0
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentarioslittleboots
escrito el 2023-06-03 12:47:23
0
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosmUbX
escrito el 2023-05-27 10:03:58
1
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosStrawbear
escrito el 2023-05-26 12:49:30
2
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosWowmusicable
escrito el 2023-05-24 19:39:23
1
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosKat
escrito el 2023-05-24 19:00:40
1
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosPerilax
escrito el 2023-05-24 08:38:05
Nuevo comentario: