I don't know if I'm the only one experiencing this bug, but alot of times the buttons to copy the rematch string / TD script, doesn't work, i tracked it down to https://code.jquery.com/jquery-2.1.4.min.js not retuning anything 7/10 of the times (with ad blocker off, it will eventually load after 10 or so refreshes, would it be possible to use a different CDN for jquery instead? Never had this jquery issue on other sites, just this site.
Not sure if its related, but I got a dual homed PC, with both IPv4 and IPv6, but something is off using the code from jquery.com, but not the other CDNs.
i had a thought about comparing pet collections here. i don't know how hard it would be or if there is even a call for it. I was wondering about being able to sort or somehow easily see the pets that a collection is missing compared to another? if there is a way in the current comparison i am not finding it thanks again for all your work!
edit: i just saw the upcoming project that may be related to my idea. my bad （已編輯）
Hi. Much thanks for this absolutely invaluable site!!! I hope this is an ok place to post a suggestion: Would it be possible for the "pet substitution" thingy to sort by pet level so your level 25 pets show up first? I run into this mostly on the Rabbits and Snails where I have like 16 of them but only 3-4 leveled fully so I have to hit the arrow a dozen times to find a leveled one.
It'd also be helpful to show the pet levels when you have more than 1 pet. So you could tell without hovering if you have all level 1s, or possibly a level 25 in there. I guess for space reasons maybe a level range would work. E.g. "Your pet: 3* (1-25)". Hope that makes sense. Thanks!
Hey!
This is a perfect place to leave feedback and make suggestions ^^
The substitutes were supposed to behave exactly like you say, with pets you have leveled to 25 and rare showing up first, others later. I took a look at that and found a bug that caused this to not work properly. It should be fixed now, have a look please and tell me if that's what you were looking for :)
I could add the level range in brackets as well but don't feel that it's needed because of the color coding. If you have at least one of the duplicates on 25 rare, the bar will be green and that should be enough to do the strategy. Otherwise it's yellow. This also takes into account multiple uses of pets (e.g. a strategy asking for 2 or 3x the same pet).
What do you think, does that do the trick or do you still think the level range would help?
I'm not always seeing the sorting. For instance, on this one, the rabbits still seem pretty random, with the blue 25s actually being last: Link
However, on this one with snails, the sorting is better: Link The first alternates there for me are rare 25s which is good. Then a 1 green, 6 gray, then 23 white (so kinda random) but then the last 2 are missing which seems correct. Maybe you aren't sorting the non-25s but descending level would be nice as you can then use stones to level or make blue.
I think you are right about the level range not being needed. The color coding (which I didn't exactly realize there) and the level sorting should do the trick!
One last thing: when viewing alternate strategies I'll see Red/yellow for missing/low level pets even when I might have a great substitute. Not sure what to suggest about this. Maybe a checkbox in the Strategy Alternates Browser to show substitutes? Or maybe automatically show substitutes if the specific pet isn't leveled, but with an asterisk in the corner? Not sure what is possible or best but thought I'd mention it. Thanks! （已編輯）
Looking more... maybe it's just the rabbits that aren't putting 25s first? Everything else does indeed seem to be putting the 25s as the first substitutes. (A full descending level sort would be best but maybe that adds more server load.)
I've had another look and you're right. The sorting works now but only takes into consideration if you A) have the pet in rare 25, B) have the pet but it's not 25 rare or C) do not have the pet. All pets in category B) are in a random order, meaning sometimes level 1 pets come before level 25 because both are not rare quality. I'll see if I can optimize that to prioritize lvl 25 pets to be first there :)
EDIT: Done, better now?
-------
Substitues for alternatives are a very tricky topic. I can't add that by default, because substitutes are in most cases no perfect match. For example, a creator might select a HS breed pet because it needs exactly >280 speed. A substitute with HS breed might only have 278 speed, making the strategy always fail. From the information the creator gives me (this pet in HS), I can't know what speed *exactly* is needed and which substitutes would need to be excluded.
This would be solved by strategy creators adding hard requirements (>280 speed instead of "HS breed") but most don't do that, or even know the exact requirement.
I see two options to improve this: - Check if substitute pets are *exactly* the same. Not the case very often, some rabbits, snakes and so on but as long as they have really exactly the same stats, no problem. The sub finder currently doesn't do that - An advanced setting as you suggest to regulate how strict/lenient the sub finder is. Something that likely not many would use :D
Both are... quite heavy in dev time so I haven't really dabbled with that, so far :S （已編輯）
I'm really loving even just seeing the 25s first!!! Great improvement. I'm still getting some weirdness... like the first link above still has two blue 25s almost last for some reason (Olivetail Hare, Tolai Hare Pup) but in most other places I've looked those two correctly sort first. While I still think descending level order is ideal, it's certainly good enough now!
And it does seem to favor descending level order a lot of the time. I've been doing Family Familiar where leveling is possible and it's very satisfying to pick an alternate lvl 23 pet and still have it work (though it is risky... most reliable for the 3rd slot pet). A lot easier now.
I appreciate your thoughts on substitutes. Dev time vs usefulness is very understandable! The sub finder seems to already classify subs as green/yellow (based on abilities/speed I assume). I would say just tapping into that is good enough. Just to be able to see that when viewing all strats at once to know which ones already have green subs available. But dev time is always a consideration.
Hey! In another comment area someone found out that adblockers cause this. No idea why because the script I'm using for these overlays is usually well accepted :-(
Best I can offer is trying without adblocker on the page and if that works it, perhaps just whitelist the page. When you are logged in, 99% of the ads are hidden anyway.
Forgive me if I missed it, Will there be a Rematch and TDbattle scripts functional during Prepatch/Shadowlands? While I see mass exporting isn't a thing, will there at least be a functional addon to put in the updated strats? Thank you for all that you do.
The Mass Rematch tool mentioned here is not going to happen before Shadowlands, but there is a mass rematch export already possible for each section :)
Just go to a section and hit the blue Load Pet Table button - once loaded, a rematch export button is available
My collection doesn't get updated properly. Here it says I have 539 pets at max level, and 25 uncommon pets, while when checking my collection on warcraftpets website it tells me I have 555 at max level and 18 uncommon pets. Any idea why it's like this? I use the same char for updating both profiles.
EDIT: Am leveling battle pets atm, so the numbers mentioned above are no longer correct. There does remain a difference of 16 pets at max level between both sites, as well as a difference of 7 uncommon pets. （已編輯）
Any link from the widget sends me to what appears to be a 404 page in German. Would also like to mention that last night, the widget's date was off as well for me. It was showing the date as the 17th when it was still the 16th here in the US. As Grainne said, it probably has problems between EU/US.
love the site and want to submit my bug report. I am not sure where to post this bug report so this post might need to be moved or removed. Here is my problem: When I am looking at a strategy on my touch screen device, in Google Chrome for Android 80.0.3987.162 and click on the alternatives. A menu comes up, but if there are too many alternatives on the menu I cannot scroll down the list. If I try to scroll down it reacts to the first touch and immediately closes the menu even if I press directly on the scroll bar. It does the same thing even if I request the desktop site version in my browser.Very annoying because I cannot see all the alternatives. Thank you. （已編輯）
Hey! Absolutely the right place for this type of feedback :)
The sad but simple answer, though, is: There is no mobile version of the page. It was never designed to support mobile :/ I try to make tweaks here and there but lack the knowledge (and time) to make it really mobile friendly.
I'll log a bug ticket for me to look into the alternatives tab a bit more, maybe I can come up with a solution. Thanks for reporting it and sorry I don't have a better answer for you!
I'm honestly bemused by requests for mobile-friendliness in this context.
The only time these strats are useful is when you are actually at your PC. Why would people use a mobile browser when sitting at their keyboard? What's the condition I'm not seeing?
Some people also don't like to alt + tab if they only have one monitor. I know for me, half the time I don't remember what I was looking at when I move to a different screen. Imagine trying to do some of the strats on here, and alt-tabbing for each step.
I don't have to imagine; that's what I do when I'm checking a strat out. (I really should bring down my second monitor and find the adaptor and set it up again.) What I can't imagine is the awkwardness of trying to use a phone screen instead. But OK, if people do that, then they do, I guess.
when i'm not at home during the week (which is usually the case if not for the current quarantine stuff) and not always have access to a pc or tablet i'm sometimes forced to do strategy reworking on my phone... and that really isn't pleasant at all
Hi, are you aware of a bug that is effecting the site's Export Team feature? The error message below seems to be injecting itself into the export, also every line now includes a BR HTML tag in addition to newline markup tag.
Error messages:
This error message: "Use of undefined constant language - assumed 'language' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /kunden/426045_85652/webseiten/Petguide/classes/ajax/bt_rmsteps.php on line 152
This error message: "Use of undefined constant language - assumed 'language' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /kunden/426045_85652/webseiten/Petguide/classes/ajax/bt_rmsteps.php on line 179
I don't know if something like this is possible, but a suggestion -
For the pet dungeons, instead of just spitting out the optimal strategy for each encounter based on our pet list, make a dungeon optimal strategy list all at once? What I mean is I look up, let's say, Gnomeregon, and it tells me for optimal strategies to use the same pet in 5 fights. Maybe something where it starts at the last fight and works backwards, so your best pets are used for the last fight (let's say it's fight #10), then it goes back to fight 9 and looks for an optimal strategy that doesn't use the 3 pets you'll be using in the final fight unless you have 2+ of one of them. This way you don't get to fight 8 and it says to use Ikky, but all 3 are either dead or too wounded from fights 2, 4 and 5 to be used again. （已編輯）
That's definitely planned :) It's currenty listed as "Upcoming Project: New Dungeon Tool" and what you are suggesting is *exactly* what I'm planning to do ^^
Hope I'll be through this current database rework soon so I can jump on cooler stuff like this one.
Thanks for the suggestion! If you have any other ideas, always happy to hear them
I would suggest GitHub or GitLab for maintaining and developing this project. These 2 tools are no overkil for this "small project" as you called it in the beginning. Both offer free code versioning for private repositories, Issue Tracking and more. Personally I prefer GitLab as it has more features.
Hey ragath!
I know about both and what they do, but have never used them to work on a software product. I'm very much a novice in this field and in the creation of this page I made many mistakes that make it very hard to move it to a repository, mostly security details (hardcoded passwords yay!). The effort to make everything ready for such a move is probably quite high, and a big unknown to me. So it's part not wanting to invest the time and part not wanting people to see the code behind this page that keeps me from doing it ^^'
I'm a professional software developer and I work with GitHub everyday. So in case you are interested in learnig how to get to a "new Level" I could give you some tips. With private repositories your code is not public and not visible to others. In case of hard-coded passwords and stuff there are simple methods how to handle it, e.g. using .env files or simple array files. But I also understand that it's a bit of work to migrate this project to GitLab etc
I’d like to report a bug, hope this is the right place. A linked group of similar crabs, starting with Kelp Scuttler, does not have their abilities aligned. For example, if the Kelp Scuttler is listed with the skills 1 1 2, when you scroll through the rest of the group, they are all listed as skills 2 2 2, while they should be the same as the first one. You can see it in this strategy:
Would also like to add that this site is amazing! I’m very impressed with both how it looks and especially how well done the coding behind it! Thank you!
Thank you for your kind words :) I reuploaded the pet and told our master tinkerer, and it seems it's okay now. Hopefully it was not a signal of something more severe ^^
Wondering - now that they changed the way pet battles work, would it be doable to add the pet trainer names in brackets beside the quest name? Not everyone knows the WQ name if it isnt up, but the trainer name is easy to reference.
Meaning stuff like Family Battler - IE: Zuldazar quest for "Small Beginnings" - Show it as either "Zujai - Small Beginnings", or "Small Beginnings (Zujai)"
Not too soon: To avoid duplicates, any achievement-specific (Plushie, Family and as it was suggested The Longest Day) strategy could be automatically linked in the "global" encounter list (still redirecting to family section after clicking). To prevent clutter, they could be displayed only via user input to show more. If this is not worth it, just expand the duplicate warning to all sections of the page… though it could be problem when someone decides to apply a strat the other way i.e. from globals to specific ones :P
On the website, you can see the steps it takes to defeat the tamer. If you flip this before importing the Team into the game, you will see these steps in pet battle (in a note)
Implementing a mention feature like I've seen you talk about sounds fantastic.
Another thing I've thought would be great would be adding a "date posted" and/or "date updated" to strategy pages. That way if/when Blizzard nerfs and makes changes to battle pets again, we'll be able to see when the strategy was posted, and whether or not it's been updated since the changes Blizzard made, so we know to alert others in the comments about it or to just look into finding a more recent strategy.
Just found this page of upcoming projects. A lot of great stuff there. Just a couple requests.Under #10, you asked "Add a friend (what effects)" I would love to be able to add a friend and compare our pets, to see which ones they have that I still need. Also I would love a category on the pet lists that tells me how rare my pets are compared to the rest of the wow population, something like "Pet name = Ikky: Owned by 25% of other players"
I love the site and have used it religiously for several years, thanks for all your hard work.
If I could give one little bit of feedback. I copy the turn instructions and paste them into the Rematch notes for each saved team. Previously the copied notes would paste with each turn on one line (with the turn number and description separated by whitespace). However, sometime between mid-Legion and today the page structure has changed so that copy and paste now loses the formatting and each cell is on its own line (so the turn number is on its own line then the description on the next line and so on).
I'd love to see the old table structure return (maybe just for the popout?) although tbh its not a major problem to manually fix the notes after pasting.
Hey Pike! I'm aware of this and one of the next things I'll work on is to include the strategy steps into rematch notes directly, so you won't have to do 2 copy pastes anymore, and this formatting issue will be gone at the same time :-)
Hey! Long time user here, love love love your work :)
Have seen few suggestions similar to mine, relating high XP battles leveling pet fights.
I was thinking of a list of fights for Pet battle week (bonus event) when you get that lovely +200% XP, focusing to those battles that give high XP.
So my idea was to have a list categorized by areas, where you can find those battles that give high XP, so most beneficial to do on the bonus week. It could be a pet leveling strat at the same time even on the weeks where the bonus XP isn't on.
Not sure where to put suggestions but here's mine.
Allow users to link pets when typing comments so you could use your links you want for wowhead on your own site as well. Also the links would allow you to say prevent people from link beast pets on the Aquatic Assault page etc. Additionally, it could eventually even help you import strategies from comments.
Hey :) Thanks a lot for the suggestion. That is planned as part of the "Pet Cards" project. At the same time I will most likely add a "mention" feature, like on many other platforms, where you put an @ and start typing a username and can then select a name to be mentioned and they get a ping about it.
Just wondering how Battletable 2.0 is coming along. Looking forward to the new features and hadn't seen any noticeable updates on this Development Notes page lately. Thanks for all the team's great work on the site. I love it.
Hey :)
There are smaller changes here and there. I did put it to 70% completed recently because the main parts are done, and I think that's a fair estimate :D There's only some minor additions missing like a system for tags, or the coordinates of tamers. I'm getting there! Outside of weekends I barely find the time to work on it nowadays, unfortunately. But I think at least this part will be ready well before BfA comes out.
Could you extend the Pet List by a Column where you can show the source where to optain the pet ? the source is already there but its only showing in the pet cards and not in the table.
1
Meows#2580
發表在 2022-01-10 00:19:35
https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.4/jquery.min.js
https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.4/jquery.min.js
https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/[email protected]/dist/jquery.min.js
is some alternative CDNs.
Not sure if its related, but I got a dual homed PC, with both IPv4 and IPv6, but something is off using the code from jquery.com, but not the other CDNs.
（已編輯）
1
Aranesh
發表在 2022-05-09 11:41:11
1
Toenail
發表在 2022-02-04 22:49:30
edit: i just saw the upcoming project that may be related to my idea. my bad （已編輯）
1
Aranesh
發表在 2022-05-09 11:39:42
https://www.wow-petguide.com/Compare
Enjoy!
1
Barbasol#1361
發表在 2021-11-29 17:32:05
It'd also be helpful to show the pet levels when you have more than 1 pet. So you could tell without hovering if you have all level 1s, or possibly a level 25 in there. I guess for space reasons maybe a level range would work. E.g. "Your pet: 3* (1-25)". Hope that makes sense. Thanks!
2
Aranesh
發表在 2021-12-01 06:51:44
This is a perfect place to leave feedback and make suggestions ^^
The substitutes were supposed to behave exactly like you say, with pets you have leveled to 25 and rare showing up first, others later. I took a look at that and found a bug that caused this to not work properly. It should be fixed now, have a look please and tell me if that's what you were looking for :)
I could add the level range in brackets as well but don't feel that it's needed because of the color coding. If you have at least one of the duplicates on 25 rare, the bar will be green and that should be enough to do the strategy. Otherwise it's yellow. This also takes into account multiple uses of pets (e.g. a strategy asking for 2 or 3x the same pet).
What do you think, does that do the trick or do you still think the level range would help?
1
Barbasol#1361
發表在 2021-12-01 13:20:14
I'm not always seeing the sorting. For instance, on this one, the rabbits still seem pretty random, with the blue 25s actually being last:
Link
However, on this one with snails, the sorting is better:
Link
The first alternates there for me are rare 25s which is good. Then a 1 green, 6 gray, then 23 white (so kinda random) but then the last 2 are missing which seems correct. Maybe you aren't sorting the non-25s but descending level would be nice as you can then use stones to level or make blue.
I think you are right about the level range not being needed. The color coding (which I didn't exactly realize there) and the level sorting should do the trick!
One last thing: when viewing alternate strategies I'll see Red/yellow for missing/low level pets even when I might have a great substitute. Not sure what to suggest about this. Maybe a checkbox in the Strategy Alternates Browser to show substitutes? Or maybe automatically show substitutes if the specific pet isn't leveled, but with an asterisk in the corner? Not sure what is possible or best but thought I'd mention it. Thanks! （已編輯）
1
Barbasol#1361
發表在 2021-12-01 13:35:10
Edit: Well this one does rabbits fine, but others still seem off:
https://www.wow-petguide.com/Strategy/4455/Crab_People-Critter （已編輯）
1
Aranesh
發表在 2021-12-02 06:01:53
All pets in category B) are in a random order, meaning sometimes level 1 pets come before level 25 because both are not rare quality.
I'll see if I can optimize that to prioritize lvl 25 pets to be first there :)
EDIT: Done, better now?
-------
Substitues for alternatives are a very tricky topic.
I can't add that by default, because substitutes are in most cases no perfect match. For example, a creator might select a HS breed pet because it needs exactly >280 speed. A substitute with HS breed might only have 278 speed, making the strategy always fail. From the information the creator gives me (this pet in HS), I can't know what speed *exactly* is needed and which substitutes would need to be excluded.
This would be solved by strategy creators adding hard requirements (>280 speed instead of "HS breed") but most don't do that, or even know the exact requirement.
I see two options to improve this:
- Check if substitute pets are *exactly* the same. Not the case very often, some rabbits, snakes and so on but as long as they have really exactly the same stats, no problem. The sub finder currently doesn't do that
- An advanced setting as you suggest to regulate how strict/lenient the sub finder is. Something that likely not many would use :D
Both are... quite heavy in dev time so I haven't really dabbled with that, so far :S （已編輯）
2
Barbasol#1361
發表在 2021-12-03 12:43:20
And it does seem to favor descending level order a lot of the time. I've been doing Family Familiar where leveling is possible and it's very satisfying to pick an alternate lvl 23 pet and still have it work (though it is risky... most reliable for the 3rd slot pet). A lot easier now.
I appreciate your thoughts on substitutes. Dev time vs usefulness is very understandable! The sub finder seems to already classify subs as green/yellow (based on abilities/speed I assume). I would say just tapping into that is good enough. Just to be able to see that when viewing all strats at once to know which ones already have green subs available. But dev time is always a consideration.
Thanks again for all your work!
0
Wh15k3y_ 發表在 2020-09-27 08:35:36
1
Aranesh
發表在 2020-09-27 15:50:00
0
Wh15k3y_ 發表在 2020-11-30 10:15:49
1
Aranesh
發表在 2020-11-30 12:08:07
Best I can offer is trying without adblocker on the page and if that works it, perhaps just whitelist the page. When you are logged in, 99% of the ads are hidden anyway.
0
Beardsly 發表在 2020-09-07 09:52:02
1
Shenk
發表在 2020-09-07 11:39:24
1
Aranesh
發表在 2020-09-07 13:57:52
Just go to a section and hit the blue Load Pet Table button - once loaded, a rematch export button is available
1
Thoizor
發表在 2020-06-20 15:10:06
EDIT: Am leveling battle pets atm, so the numbers mentioned above are no longer correct. There does remain a difference of 16 pets at max level between both sites, as well as a difference of 7 uncommon pets. （已編輯）
1
CoJo
發表在 2020-06-17 15:30:25
1
Aranesh
發表在 2020-06-17 16:05:34
2
Gráinne
發表在 2020-06-17 16:27:30
Sir Galveston https://wow-petguide.com/8361
Jarrun https://wow-petguide.com/5043
Ahhh. US vs EU.
I had the US page up when I saw those. On EU I get the right pages. （已編輯）
1
CoJo
發表在 2020-06-17 19:27:31
1
Aranesh
發表在 2020-06-18 04:44:40
Both of these should be fixed now :) Thanks for bringing it up!
1
WalkingDead11
發表在 2020-04-03 23:18:25
2
Aranesh
發表在 2020-04-04 05:59:20
The sad but simple answer, though, is: There is no mobile version of the page. It was never designed to support mobile :/ I try to make tweaks here and there but lack the knowledge (and time) to make it really mobile friendly.
I'll log a bug ticket for me to look into the alternatives tab a bit more, maybe I can come up with a solution. Thanks for reporting it and sorry I don't have a better answer for you!
1
Shenk
發表在 2020-04-04 10:00:40
2
Gráinne
發表在 2020-04-04 10:52:29
The only time these strats are useful is when you are actually at your PC. Why would people use a mobile browser when sitting at their keyboard? What's the condition I'm not seeing?
1
Shenk
發表在 2020-04-04 12:36:38
1
DragonsAfterDark
發表在 2020-04-04 15:31:16
1
Shenk
發表在 2020-04-04 16:25:05
1
Gráinne
發表在 2020-04-04 16:25:25
1
Shenk
發表在 2020-04-04 16:31:46
2
Aranesh
發表在 2020-04-05 04:26:07
I'm in the very, very early stages of learning how to do mobile friendliness :/
1
Blocky
發表在 2020-01-14 06:28:50
Error messages:
This error message: "Use of undefined constant language - assumed 'language' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /kunden/426045_85652/webseiten/Petguide/classes/ajax/bt_rmsteps.php on line 152
This error message: "Use of undefined constant language - assumed 'language' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /kunden/426045_85652/webseiten/Petguide/classes/ajax/bt_rmsteps.php on line 179
2
Aranesh
發表在 2020-01-15 03:42:26
3
Blocky
發表在 2020-01-16 16:03:37
1
Aranesh
發表在 2020-01-17 11:48:08
1
JestersTear
發表在 2019-12-05 03:21:42
For the pet dungeons, instead of just spitting out the optimal strategy for each encounter based on our pet list, make a dungeon optimal strategy list all at once? What I mean is I look up, let's say, Gnomeregon, and it tells me for optimal strategies to use the same pet in 5 fights. Maybe something where it starts at the last fight and works backwards, so your best pets are used for the last fight (let's say it's fight #10), then it goes back to fight 9 and looks for an optimal strategy that doesn't use the 3 pets you'll be using in the final fight unless you have 2+ of one of them. This way you don't get to fight 8 and it says to use Ikky, but all 3 are either dead or too wounded from fights 2, 4 and 5 to be used again.
（已編輯）
2
Aranesh
發表在 2019-12-05 13:17:43
That's definitely planned :) It's currenty listed as "Upcoming Project: New Dungeon Tool" and what you are suggesting is *exactly* what I'm planning to do ^^
Hope I'll be through this current database rework soon so I can jump on cooler stuff like this one.
Thanks for the suggestion! If you have any other ideas, always happy to hear them
3
JestersTear
發表在 2019-12-05 16:25:54
1
ZoroarkRonan
發表在 2019-09-07 21:36:11
2
Gráinne
發表在 2019-09-07 21:37:24
1
ragath
發表在 2019-05-20 14:15:45
1
Aranesh
發表在 2019-05-21 05:31:12
I know about both and what they do, but have never used them to work on a software product. I'm very much a novice in this field and in the creation of this page I made many mistakes that make it very hard to move it to a repository, mostly security details (hardcoded passwords yay!). The effort to make everything ready for such a move is probably quite high, and a big unknown to me. So it's part not wanting to invest the time and part not wanting people to see the code behind this page that keeps me from doing it ^^'
1
ragath
發表在 2019-05-21 20:15:48
1
shybobcat
發表在 2019-03-20 01:40:39
https://www.wow-petguide.com/index.php?Strategy=1352
Would also like to add that this site is amazing! I’m very impressed with both how it looks and especially how well done the coding behind it! Thank you!
2
Remte
發表在 2019-03-20 02:58:56
I reuploaded the pet and told our master tinkerer, and it seems it's okay now. Hopefully it was not a signal of something more severe ^^
1
shybobcat
發表在 2019-03-20 19:45:07
2
Ekire
發表在 2018-12-28 12:53:36
1
Ekire
發表在 2018-12-30 11:43:38
1
Remte
發表在 2018-12-06 14:30:06
If this is not worth it, just expand the duplicate warning to all sections of the page… though it could be problem when someone decides to apply a strat the other way i.e. from globals to specific ones :P
1
Seira
發表在 2018-10-16 08:14:47
1
gsanta
發表在 2018-10-20 06:51:03
1
Seira
發表在 2018-10-21 06:53:45
1
Amber1019
發表在 2018-10-13 11:52:12
Another thing I've thought would be great would be adding a "date posted" and/or "date updated" to strategy pages. That way if/when Blizzard nerfs and makes changes to battle pets again, we'll be able to see when the strategy was posted, and whether or not it's been updated since the changes Blizzard made, so we know to alert others in the comments about it or to just look into finding a more recent strategy.
1
NIteowl1970
發表在 2018-09-26 15:08:39
0
Pike 發表在 2018-08-24 19:28:37
If I could give one little bit of feedback. I copy the turn instructions and paste them into the Rematch notes for each saved team. Previously the copied notes would paste with each turn on one line (with the turn number and description separated by whitespace). However, sometime between mid-Legion and today the page structure has changed so that copy and paste now loses the formatting and each cell is on its own line (so the turn number is on its own line then the description on the next line and so on).
I'd love to see the old table structure return (maybe just for the popout?) although tbh its not a major problem to manually fix the notes after pasting.
Thanks again for the site.
1
Aranesh
發表在 2018-09-10 05:36:45
0
Pike 發表在 2018-09-22 10:28:03
1
Nebs
發表在 2018-09-22 03:58:02
Have seen few suggestions similar to mine, relating high XP battles leveling pet fights.
I was thinking of a list of fights for Pet battle week (bonus event) when you get that lovely +200% XP, focusing to those battles that give high XP.
So my idea was to have a list categorized by areas, where you can find those battles that give high XP, so most beneficial to do on the bonus week. It could be a pet leveling strat at the same time even on the weeks where the bonus XP isn't on.
1
Cole#13497
發表在 2018-07-27 16:19:40
Allow users to link pets when typing comments so you could use your links you want for wowhead on your own site as well. Also the links would allow you to say prevent people from link beast pets on the Aquatic Assault page etc. Additionally, it could eventually even help you import strategies from comments.
2
Aranesh
發表在 2018-07-28 04:55:51
1
Cole#13497
發表在 2018-07-30 12:42:11
1
gsanta
發表在 2018-05-11 07:22:47
Just wondering how Battletable 2.0 is coming along. Looking forward to the new features and hadn't seen any noticeable updates on this Development Notes page lately. Thanks for all the team's great work on the site. I love it.
1
Aranesh
發表在 2018-05-15 03:19:27
There are smaller changes here and there. I did put it to 70% completed recently because the main parts are done, and I think that's a fair estimate :D There's only some minor additions missing like a system for tags, or the coordinates of tamers. I'm getting there! Outside of weekends I barely find the time to work on it nowadays, unfortunately. But I think at least this part will be ready well before BfA comes out.
1
gsanta
發表在 2018-05-15 07:50:41
1
Ta
發表在 2022-02-01 12:38:18
新留言