Strategy added by brona
16
16
|
Average rating: |
4.5 |
|
Ratings: |
33 |
|
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
 |
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters.
|
 |
|||||||
| 1 | 
|
Script |
2 | 5.0  |
71  |
100
1:40
|
14-16 |  |
||
| 2 | 
|
May take a few tries due to RNG.
May work with other breeds. Script thanks to Deathrall |
RNG Script |
2 | 4.5 |
16 |
110
1:50
|
17+ | |
|
| 3 |
|
**Call Darkness might critically hit and therefore one-shot Bloodbiter in Round 1. This will lead to minimal step changes (skipping a Pass, adding a Sneak Attack), so make sure to read the comments in the steps.
***There's one thing that can ruin the intended force-swap: When Tina's Starfall critically hits the Rat, but not Glutted Bleeder, the Rat has lower health and will be gripped. We could avoid that by using Bloodfeaster Larva (the Burst Critter with the lowest HP) instead, but this pet's sacrifice won't deal enough damage for a kill just with Call Darkness. It would take a Sneak Attack and that ideally before Darkness increases the chance to miss. |
Breed Script |
2 | 5.0 |
6 |
88
1:28
|
11+ | |
|
| 4 |
Any Level 25+ Critter
|
I tried to figure out a consistent strat using easy-to-obtain pets. Blackchasm Crawler is a wild battle with only 1 possible breed, Void-Scarred Beetle is a drop from BfA content that might also be cheap on the Auction House, and the 3rd pet can be any Critter that reaches high enough HP. The website should list any pets you have that fulfull the HP requirement, but if you have none, some wild pet battle options are: Mudshell Conch, Experimental Roach, or Silkbead Snail.
Script thanks to Ratsch |
Script |
2 | 4.9 |
8 |
157
2:37
|
19 | |
|
| 5 | 
|
|
Script |
2 | 4.9 |
8 |
110
1:50
|
17 | |
|
| 6 |
|
Script thanks to Begija
|
RNG Script |
2 | 4.1 |
10 |
105
1:45
|
16+ | |
|
| 7 |
|
I use HB marmot, HH Frost fur Rat, HH Blind Rat. So I think it maybe different another type pet.
|
RNG |
2 | 5.0 |
0 |
111
1:51
|
18+ | |
|
| 8 |
|
Breed RNG |
2 | 5.0 |
1 |
115
1:55
|
18 | |
||
| 9 |
|
Not mine - Credit belongs to Pixis1 on WoWHead (thanks for sharing your strat.)
|
RNG |
2 | 4.5 |
1 |
110
1:50
|
17+ | |
|
| 10 | 
|
2nd pet power restriction = 11 turns.
H/S breed = 15 turns and RNG. |
Breed Script |
2 | 0.0 |
0 |
96
1:36
|
11 | |
Incl. steps:
Substitutes:
1 / 2
1 / 2
1 / 9
May take a few tries due to RNG.
May work with other breeds.
Script thanks to Deathrall
1 Min 50 Sec
17+ 
2023-11-25 22:04:07
2022-12-05 14:55:23
18,806
Unknown
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Sneak Attack until swappedFor the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
CounterstrikeFor the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Bite until deadFor the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Sneak Attack until deadFor the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Counterstrike > Bite until deadFor the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Terrible Tina? Sounds like a familiar Wonderland!
Call Darkness
Crouch
2
Ruta
wrote on 2023-05-07 13:37:17
3
Deathrall
wrote on 2023-04-15 02:42:05
standby [round = 3]
use(Crouch:165) [enemy.aura(Flying:341).exists]
standby [enemy.aura(Flying:341).exists]
use(Call Darkness:256)
use(Counterstrike:158)
use(#1)
change(next)
1
Priessa
wrote on 2023-02-08 22:59:04
New Comment: